397
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Assessment Procedures

Reliability and validity of upper limb short questionnaire for Duchenne muscular dystrophy

& ORCID Icon
Pages 2448-2455 | Received 02 Apr 2020, Accepted 22 Sep 2020, Published online: 07 Oct 2020
 

Abstract

Purpose

In patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), weakness of the upper limb (UL) muscles has a significant impact on daily activities and body functions. This problem necessitates a screening tool that can be used quickly and easily in clinical situations, such as the Upper Limb Short Questionnaire (ULSQ). However, its validity and reliability as a clinical measure have not yet been evaluated.

Materials and methods

The ULSQ was initially administered in face-to-face interviews, and then by telephone four weeks later. Lower limb and UL body functions were assessed by the Vignos and modified Brooke scales, respectively.

Results

A total of 160 patients participated in the initial ULSQ interview; 132 patients completed the follow-up interview. Construct validity was confirmed by exploratory and subsequent confirmatory factor analyses. The UL function component sum score correlated with the modified Brooke scale score (Kendall’s Tau 0.64, p < 0.001). The total and component (UL function, pain, and stiffness) sum scores were higher in non-ambulators than in ambulators. The reliability was acceptable, as determined by internal consistency and test-retest agreement.

Conclusion

The ULSQ is a valid and reliable measurement tool for screening UL function, pain, and stiffness in patients with DMD in clinical settings.

    IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION

  • The Upper Limb Short Questionnaire (ULSQ) for patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) can be easily used in clinical settings.

  • The ULSQ comprises 14 items that assess upper limb function, pain, and stiffness in patients with DMD and is a valid and reliable assessment tool for screening purposes.

  • The sum score of the upper limb function component (ULSQ 1–5; 1 point per item) could be used to measure activity limitations.

Acknowledgment

We gratefully acknowledge the effort of Yale Kim, a physical therapist.

Disclosure statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Additional information

Funding

The study was approved by Seoul National University Hospital Institutional Review Board [IRB no. 1810-120-982].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 374.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.