624
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reviews

Efficacy of face-to-face behavior change counseling interventions on physical activity behavior in cancer survivors – a systematic review and meta-analysis

, , , &
Pages 5386-5401 | Received 03 Sep 2020, Accepted 30 May 2021, Published online: 14 Jul 2021
 

Abstract

Purpose

This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials determines the efficacy of face-to-face behavior change counseling (BCC) interventions on physical activity (PA) behavior in adult cancer survivors at least pre-and immediately post-intervention compared to usual care. Additionally, this review aims to answer the question which behavior change techniques (BCTs) are most effective.

Materials and methods

A structured search of the databases Medline, OTseeker, PEDro, the Cochrane Library, and article reference lists was conducted. All trials were critically appraised for methodological quality using the PEDro scale. The BCC interventions were coded using the BCT Taxonomy (v1). Random effect meta-analysis explored between group differences in PA behavior post intervention. Standardized mean differences (SMD) describe effect sizes.

Results

Fourteen studies were included, 12 effect sizes within 11 trials were pooled in meta-analysis. The SMD between groups favored the intervention group with a small effect (SMD 0.22; 95% CI 0.11, 0.33; p < 0.0001). The BCTs “graded tasks”, “self-monitoring of behavior”, “action planning” and “habit reversal” were more frequently coded in more efficacious interventions.

Conclusion

BCC interventions are effective in increasing PA behavior in cancer survivors. Further research is needed providing details of fidelity assessment and structuring the intervention description by using a BCT taxonomy. Health care professionals should consider our results while awaiting further trial evaluation.

    Implications for Rehabilitation

  • Face-to-face behavior change counseling interventions can significantly increase physical activity behavior in cancer survivors.

  • Although small differences are evident, included trials presented with a broad variety of study components, and characteristics, which limits the interpretation of effective components.

  • The behavior change techniques “Graded tasks”, “Action planning”, “Habit reversal”, and “Credible Source” were used in the trials with a positive effect, but not in the ineffective ones.

Correction Statement

This article has been corrected with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.

Disclosure statement

The authors have no potential financial or personal conflicts of interest to disclose in relation to this work. The authors have full control of all the primary data and agree to allow the journal to review the data if requested.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 374.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.