112
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Papers

Reliability of pain scores during a body weight support protocol in individuals with knee osteoarthritis

, , &
Pages 8382-8387 | Received 23 Apr 2021, Accepted 05 Dec 2021, Published online: 21 Dec 2021
 

Abstract

Purpose

To explore the reliability of percentage of Body Weight Support (BWS) needed for maximal pain relief and of pain scores across 12 walking conditions including pre and post-over-ground walking and an unweighting protocol from 0% to 40% BWS on a lower body positive pressure (LBPP) treadmill for individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA).

Materials and methods

Twenty individuals (64 ± 9.44 years) with knee OA completed over-ground walking and an unweighting protocol on an LBPP treadmill. The amount of BWS started at 0% and increased by 5% increments until it reached 40%. Pain scores were recorded at the end of each increment.

Results

The reliability of pain scores was assessed using a Spearman’s rho. This study found moderate reliability of the percentage of BWS for maximal pain relief. Additionally, there was good reliability of pain scores with pre and post-over-ground walking and from 0% BWS to 30% BWS, but moderate reliability of pain scores was found at 35% and 40% BWS.

Conclusion

This study supports the use of pain scores as a reliable measure during an unweighted walking session on an LBPP treadmill.

    IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION

  • Both the OARSI and ACR recommend exercise in the treatment of individuals with knee OA but acknowledge that pain during exercise and exercise preference/accessibility are important when considering the type of exercise for an individual.

  • LBPP treadmills decrease pain in individuals with knee OA during walking.

  • Pain scores during unweighted walking show moderate to good reliability for individuals with knee OA.

  • This study provides an unweighting protocol to use clinically to determine the Body Weight Support needed to decrease pain.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 374.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.