119
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Assessment Procedures

The Arabic version of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale is a reliable and valid measure of activity limitation in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

&
Pages 8487-8492 | Received 18 Jun 2021, Accepted 10 Dec 2021, Published online: 27 Dec 2021
 

Abstract

Purpose

To examine the psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS-Ar) in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Materials and methods

Stable individuals with COPD (N = 70) confirmed by spirometry were asked to complete the LEFS-Ar, St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and performed the Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT). Participants were also asked to complete LEFS-Ar for the second time within 10 days. The LEFS-Ar floor and ceiling effects, internal consistency, test–retest reliability, measurement error, and construct validity were examined.

Results

The LEFS-Ar had excellent internal consistency with Cronbach’s alpha of 0.95 and excellent test–retest reliability (ICCagreement=0.91) with no floor and ceiling issues. Standard error of measurement was 4.78 points while the minimal detectable change at 90% confidence was 11.15 points. Consistent with our hypotheses, the LEFS-Ar scores correlated significantly with 6MWT (r= −0.66, p < 0.001), activity domain of the SGRQ (r = 0.55, p < 0.001), and were significantly different according to COPD disease severity (p= 0.02).

Conclusions

In people with COPD, the LEFS-Ar has excellent reliability with no floor or ceiling effects. The LEFS-Ar demonstrated evidence supporting its validity as a measure of activity limitation that can be used in clinical practice and in research studies.

    Implications for rehabilitation

  • The Arabic version of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS-Ar) is a reliable measure in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

  • Rehabilitation specialists can use the LEFS-Ar to validly measure activity limitation in people with COPD.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

The authors extend their appreciation to the College of Applied Medical Sciences Research Center and the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University for funding this research.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 374.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.