372
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Older and younger adults’ revision of health misconceptions

ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 172-189 | Received 13 Jan 2021, Accepted 25 Oct 2021, Published online: 10 Nov 2021
 

ABSTRACT

Although ample younger adult research has detailed effective strategies for revising misconceptions, research with older adults is less extensive. Older adults may be less able to correct errors in knowledge due to age-related changes in cognition, but it is also possible that older adults’ revision of misconceptions has been limited by methodologies which do not provide adequate support for correction. In two experiments, we examined how older and younger adults revise health-related misconceptions when provided with cognitive support in the form of explicit detailed feedback and an immediate test. Older and younger adults in Experiment 1 answered true/false health statements, received feedback with a detailed explanation of the correct response, took an additional test on the same statements immediately following the initial test, and completed a final test 1-week later. Older and younger adults corrected a similar proportion of misconceptions immediately and maintained most of those revisions across a 1-week delay. In Experiment 2, older adults corrected the same proportion of misconceptions on the final test regardless of whether or not they received a test immediately following feedback. Overall, older adults revised health misconceptions as effectively as did younger adults but variables influencing correction (e.g., belief in feedback) may differ.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

1 Experiment 2 was conducted online due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Analyses comparing the older adult samples in Experiment 1 and Experiment 2 can be found at https://osf.io/v26fe/.

Additional information

Funding

This research was supported by the James S. McDonnell Foundation twenty-first Century Science Initiative in Understanding Human Cognition Collaborative Activity Grant and the Eastern Washington University Faculty Grant for Research and Creative Works. The supplemental analyses, materials, and raw data have been uploaded to the Open Science Framework and can be accessed at https://osf.io/v26fe/.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 354.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.