198
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

‘Othering’ in peer education: a case study of the rebirth peer education program in China

&
Pages 470-478 | Received 18 Mar 2019, Accepted 17 Dec 2019, Published online: 06 Jan 2020
 

Abstract

Peer education has been extensively incorporated into various inclusion schemes, for purposes ranging from health promotion to participant empowerment. This paper examines the impact of peer education on reducing stigmatization in marginalized populations through an examination of the structure and activities of Rebirth Peer Education, a Chinese anti-drug peer education program. Based on the thematic analysis of organizational documents and interview data collected from RPE’s social workers, peer educators, and peer members, this study finds that peer education can actually work to exacerbate the stigmatization and marginalization of people who use drugs (PWUD) through the ‘othering’ processes encountered in these programs. ‘Othering’ is a process in which those who are considered different are labelled, dismissed and scapegoated. Consequently, this process also stigmatizes and marginalizes those who are defined as ‘others.’ In RPE, ‘othering’ takes place through the organizations’ recruitment and promotion processes, which are based on and further reinforce a perception of ‘clean,’ strong-willed, former PWUD and ‘unclean,’ weak, current PWUD. The glorification of peer educators further works to ‘other’ PWUD. The results suggest that peer education has the potential to further, rather than reduce, the stigmatization of PWUD.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Acknowledgement

The work described in this paper was fully supported by the Open University of Hong Kong Research Grant (No. 2016/1.1). We thank the support of Public and Social Policy Research Centre of The Open University of Hong Kong to this work. We are also indebted to the following professors for their valuable comments and suggestions: Jianhua Xu, Tiffany Ip, Jessica Li, Nicole Cheung, and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions on an earlier draft of the paper.

Correction Statement

This article has been republished with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by Open University of Hong Kong Research Grant [2016/1.1].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 856.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.