254
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Characterisation of a hybrid plant-based asphalt binder replacement with high reactive phenolic monomer content

ORCID Icon &
Pages 4675-4696 | Received 07 Apr 2021, Accepted 13 Aug 2021, Published online: 27 Aug 2021
 

ABSTRACT

The present study was undertaken to formulate a hybrid plant-based modifier to replace at least 20% of a non-polymer-modified asphalt binder (non-PMB). Different amounts of two types of lignin (L1 and L2) having high reactive phenolic monomer contents and a corn-based recycling agent (RCA) were shear-mixed with a PG 58-28 binder. Rheological properties of binder blends and those of neat PG 58-28 and PG 64-28 (PMB) were characterised. Also, their adhesion to granite and quartzite aggregates was evaluated. Furthermore, asphalt mixes containing neat PG 58-28 and that modified by different amounts of L1, L2, and RCA were produced and their resistance to cracking, rutting, and stripping was evaluated. While incorporating 25%L2 + 2%RCA in PG 58-28 was found to improve its resistance to rutting and thermal cracking, using 25% L1 caused excessive binder embrittlement. Incorporating L1, L2, or RCA in PG 58-28 was not found to have an adverse effect on binder-aggregate adhesion. Achieving a PG 64-28 binder (PMB) was found to be feasible by incorporating 25%L2 + 2%RCA in PG 58-28 binder while replacing 21.3% of virgin binder. Asphalt mixes containing L2 or a combination L2 + RCA exhibited resistance to cracking, rutting, and stripping which were higher than those of the control mix.

Acknowledgements

The help and comments received from Mr Steve Bly and Dr Alex McCurdy (POET LLC) are acknowledged. Authors would like to thank Dr Musharraf Zaman, Mr Kenneth Hobson, and Dr Syed Ashik Ali for their invaluable help. The contents of this article are the opinions of the authors and are not necessarily those of the sponsor.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

The study presented herein was conducted with financial support received from POET LLC [grant number SA1800512].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 225.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.