Abstract
Probiotic products’ economic value and market popularity have grown over time as more people discover their health advantages and adopt healthier lifestyles. There is a significant societal and cultural interest in these products known as foods or medicines. Products containing probiotics that claim to provide health advantages must maintain a “minimum therapeutic” level (107-106 CFU/g) of bacteria during their entire shelf lives. Since probiotic bacteria are susceptible to degradation and reduction by physical and chemical conditions (including acidity, natural antimicrobial agents, nutrient contents, redox potential, temperature, water activity, the existence of other bacteria, and sensitivity to metabolites), the most challenging problem for a food manufacturer is ensuring probiotic cells’ survival and stability enhancement throughout the manufacturing stage. Currently, the use of plant-based hydrogels for improved and targeted probiotic delivery has gained substantial attention as a potential approach to overcoming the mentioned restrictions. To achieve the best possible results from hydrogels, whether used as a coating for encapsulated probiotics (with the goal of stomach protection) or as carriers for direct encapsulation of live microorganisms should be applied kind of procedures that ensure high bacterial survival during hydrogels application. This paper summarizes polysaccharides, proteins, and lipid-based hydrogels as carriers of encapsulated probiotics in delivery systems, reviews their structures, analyzes their advantages and disadvantages, studies their mechanical characteristics, and draws comparisons between them. The discussion then turns to how the criterion affects encapsulation, applications, and future possibilities.
Authors contributions
Saber Amiri and Narmin Nezamdoost-Sani: Investigation, Data curation, Resources, Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing original draft. Parisa Mostashari: Supervision, Literature searching, Writing original draft & Editing. Krystian Marszałek: Writing original draft. David Julian McClements and Amin Mousavi Khaneghah: Supervision, review & editing.
Conflict of interest
The authors confirm that they are independent of any known conflicting financial interests or close personal ties that could potentially impact the study presented in this article.
Funding
The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.