Clinical Communication Within Hospital Pharmacy Practice: Exploring Pharmaceutical Oncological Consultations

ABSTRACT

This exploratory study aimed to identify communication trends typical of pharmacists’ clinical communication in the context of hospital consultations. A cross-sectional design was used to investigate the pharmacist-patient exchange, applying the Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS). Communication variables and RIAS composites were assessed, including therapeutic information complexity, estimated through the ad-hoc score CTICS (Cancer Therapy Information Complexity Score). The study comprised 13 consultations of cancer patients with one female pharmacist, of which 6 included a patient family member, lasting on average 22.74 minutes and presenting repeated or overlapping consultation phases. The pharmacist’s talk dominance reached 53.49%, slightly higher in dyadic consultations (U = 6.0, p = .032), and with an overall predominance of closed-ended questioning (W = 81.0, p = .013). Patients’ questioning on biomedical issues was higher in dyadic consultations. The level of the pharmacist’s rapport-building with the relative was higher when the patient’s age was ≥80 years. Several strong correlations, both positive and negative, were found between composites, including between patient positive rapport-building and relative lifestyle/psychosocial information giving (Rho = −0.971, p = .001). Pharmaceutical consultations seem to be lengthier than other hospital practitioners’ interviews, indicating a lack of  clear organization and flow, thus challenging their efficiency regarding therapy management. Still, several positive communication features were found regarding the pharmaceutical care of older cancer patients. Further studies are needed, involving larger samples and other hospital consultation settings.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all participants and hospital pharmacists who allowed this study to be possible.

Disclosure statement

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest concerning the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Additional information

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.