545
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Effects of Character Accent on Perceived Similarity, Transportation, and Narrative Persuasion

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 818-827 | Published online: 06 Mar 2023
 

ABSTRACT

Guided by narrative transportation theory and the social identity approach, this study examined the effects of character accent on perceived similarity, transportation, and narrative persuasion. Cigarette smokers from Kentucky (N = 492) listened to a first-person narrative about smoking-induced lung cancer. The character spoke either with a Southern American English (SAE; ingroup) or a General American English (GAE; outgroup) accent. Opposite to predictions, the GAE-accented character was perceived as more similar overall, engendered greater transportation, elevated lung cancer risk perceptions, and promoted higher intentions to quit smoking than the SAE-accented character. Consistent with predictions, the effects of character accent on risk perceptions and intentions to quit were mediated by perceived similarity and transportation. Taken together, these findings indicate that narrative character accent is a potent cue to similarity judgments, but that actual linguistic similarity is not isomorphic with perceived overall similarity. Theoretical and practical implications for narrative persuasion are discussed.

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2023.2185926

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

1. Actual and perceived similarity are not isomorphic, as actual similarities may not be perceived as such (see J. Cohen et al., Citation2018; Ooms et al., Citation2019).

2. At the request of one reviewer, we also tested an alternate model in which perceived similarity, transportation, and perceived risk were all treated as parallel (and uncorrelated) mediators of the effect of source accent on intent. This model fit the data poorly, χ2(4) = 214.83, p < .001, RMSEA =.33, 95% CI [.2937], PCLOSE <.001, CFI =.47, TLI = 0.00, SRMR =.17.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by a Speed Dating for Researchers-X Collaborative Funding grant from the College of Communication and Information at the University of Kentucky.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 371.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.