389
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Investigating the Relationship between Web Object Characteristics and Cognitive Conflict Using Mouse-tracking

Pages 99-117 | Published online: 31 Aug 2020
 

ABSTRACT

The present study used mouse-tracking to investigate the impacts of web object characteristics on cognitive conflict during a naturalistic website use task. An online survey (N = 191) gathered baseline location typicality ratings for common web objects. An in-person laboratory study (N = 101) presented images of popular websites with target objects in expected (e.g., Cart, top right) or unexpected (e.g., Cart, top left) locations. Participants searched for and clicked on targets while continuous mouse trajectories were recorded. Mouse-tracking measures revealed evidence for cognitive conflict for three of the targets when they appeared in unexpected locations (Menu, Cart, Account). Response times and error rates were unaffected, and results were robust to variability in familiarity with targets and websites. These results suggest that mouse-tracking can be used to examine the relationship between target characteristics and cognitive conflict, and that cognitive conflict depends on the identity and location of web objects.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to User Experience Center (UXC) colleagues and staff (Sydney Bee, Emilea Avery, Erin Fegely), research assistants (Helen Xinchang He, Cassandra French-Majersky, Pere Perewari), and Bentley’s Information Design & Corporate Communication department colleagues. We are also grateful colleagues in Bentley’s Marketing department for providing access to Bentley’s SONA participant pool, and to the Jeanne & Dan Valente Center for Arts & Sciences.

Disclosure of potential conflict of interest

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed at the publisher’s website.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by Bentley University.

Notes on contributors

Jonathan D. Ericson

Jonathan D. Ericson is an Assistant Professor of Information Design & Corporate Communication (IDCC) at Bentley University. His research in human-computer interaction focuses on applying emerging technologies to healthcare, architecture, sustainability, data visualization, and creative interface design. He holds a PhD in Cognitive Science from Brown University.

William S. Albert

William S. Albert is currently the Executive Director of the Bentley University User Experience Center. His research interests focus on human-computer interaction, quantitative user research methods, and user experience strategy. He is currently the co-editor in chief of the Journal of Usability Studies. He holds a PhD in Geography (spatial cognition) from Boston University.

Benjamin P. Bernard

Benjamin P. Bernard is currently an M.S. candidate in Bentley University’s Human Factors in Information Design (HFID) program. His research interests include human-computer interaction, individual differences in website use, and statistical analysis.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 306.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.