117
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reprint

Russia and Regional Institutions in the Asia-Pacific Region

Pages 162-176 | Published online: 30 Apr 2019
 

Abstract

Until the past few years, post-Soviet Russia devoted insufficient attention to multilateral processes of cooperation in the Asia-Pacific Region (APR). This situation gradually started to change in the period leading up to and during Russia’s stint as chair of Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation in 2012. An additional stimulus to more active Russian participation in institutions of regional cooperation in the APR was implementation of the policy of the “turn to the East,” which became especially urgent after the crisis of 2014 in Russia’s relations with the West. As it happened, however, Russia strengthened its ties with multilateral institutions in the APR at exactly the time when many mechanisms of cooperation were in crisis and weakened by tensions between China and the United States in the region and also by competing regional projects promoted by these powers.

This article is the republished version of:
Russia and Regional Institutions in the Asia-Pacific Region

Notes

1. The Group of Eight during the period when Russia was a member (1998–2014).

2. L. Shevtsova, “Russia’s ‘Pivot’ to China: Is It Real or Fake?” Global Asia, 2013, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 46.

3. Elizabeth Wishnick, “In search of the ‘Other’ in Asia: Russia–China Relations Revisited,” Pacific Review, 2016, vol. 29, no. 4 (www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09512748.2016.1201129).

4. N.K. Arbatova, “Rossiia i ES: vozmozhnosti partnerstva,” in N.K. Arbatova, Rossiia-Evropeiskii Soiuz: vozmozhnosti partnerstva (Moscow: Spetskniga, 2013), pp. 28–38.

5. “Bol’shaia Vostochnaia Aziia”: mirovaia politika i regional’nye transformatsii, ed. A.D. Voskresenskii (Moscow: MGIMO, 2010), pp. 253–54.

6. C. Ziegler, “Contrasting U.S., Chinese and Russian Perceptions of Sovereignty,” Comparative Politics (Russia), 2012, vol. 3, no. 1(7), pp. 14–22.

7. P. Drysdale, “Has Russia Reinvented APEC as Well as Its Asia Pacific Posture?” East Asia Forum, September 3, 2012 (www.eastasiaforum.org/2012/09/03/has-russia-reinvented-apec-as-well-as-its-asia-pacific-posture/; accessed September 18, 2016).

8. K. Magalif, Russia in APEC 2011–2013: The Turn Towards Asia Pacific (Virginia International University, October 1, 2013) (https://viu.edu/docs/cdia/Russia_in_ALEC_2011-2013.pdf; accessed September 18, 2016).

9. Yuen Foong Khong and Helen E.S. Nesadurai, “Hanging Together, Institutional Design, and Cooperation in Southeast Asia: AFTA and the ARF,” in Crafting Cooperation: Regional International Institutions in Comparative Perspective, ed. Amitav Acharya and Alastair Iain Johnston (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), p. 33.

10. V.N. Kolotov, “Evraziiskaia duga nestabil’nosti: istoriia formirovaniia, sovremennoe sostoianie i perspektivy na budushchee,” in V.N. Kolotov, Evraziiskaia duga nestabil’nosti Evraziiskaia duga nestabil’nosti i problem regional’noi bezopasnosti ot Vostochnoi Azii do Severnoi Afriki (St. Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo Studiia NP-Print, 2013), p. 29.

11. Hillary Clinton, “America’s Pacific Century,” Foreign Policy, November 2011 (http://foreignpolicy.com/2011/10/11/americas-pacific-century/).

12. Hugh White, “Asian Century Must Begin with Great-Power Accommodation,” East Asia Forum, June 29, 2015 (www.eastasiaforum.org/2015/06/29/asian-century-must-begin-with-great-power-accommodation/; accessed September 18, 2016).

13. China Adds South China Sea to ‘Core Interest’ in New Policy (http://zeenews.india.com/news/world/china-adds-south-china-sea-to-core-interest-in-new-policy_638592.html; accessed May 20, 2012). Chinese discourse with foreign policy partners about “core interests” was previously dominated mainly by the issues of Taiwan, Tibet, and Xinjiang (A.D. Voskresenskii, “Mirovoi finansovo-ekonomicheskii krizis i ego vliianie na razvitie otnoshenii v treugol’nike Kitai-SShA-Rossiia,” Sravnitel’naia politika, 2011, no. 1, p. 76).

14. “Divided We Stagger,” Economist, August 18, 2012 (www.economist.com/node/21560585; accessed September 18, 2016).

15. Putin vystupil protiv sozdaniia Transtikhookeanskogo partnerstva bez Rossii i Kitaia, TASS, November 6, 2014 (http://tass.ru/politika/1555910; accessed September 18, 2016).

16. Kontseptsiia vneshnei politiki Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Utverzhdena Prezidentom Rossiiskoi Federatsii V.V. Putinym 12 fevralia 2013 g. (www.mid.ru/brp_4.nsf/0/6D84DDEDEDBF7DA644257B160051BF7F; accessed September 18, 2016).

17. A. Gabuev, “Sammitom ne vyshli,” Carnegie Moscow Center, September 6, 2016 (http://carnegie.ru/2016/09/06/ru-64499/j520; accessed September 18, 2016).

18. M. Korostikov, “Pod vysokim sopriazheniem,” Kommersant, May 9, 2016 (http://kommersant.ru/doc/2978877; accessed September 18, 2016).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.