500
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Verification testing to confirm VO2max attainment in persons with spinal cord injury

, , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 494-501 | Published online: 22 Jan 2018
 

Abstract

Context/Objective:

Maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) is a widely used measure of cardiorespiratory fitness, aerobic function, and overall health risk. Although VO2max has been measured for almost 100 yr, no standardized criteria exist to verify VO2max attainment. Studies document that incidence of ‘true’ VO2max obtained from incremental exercise (INC) can be confirmed using a subsequent verification test (VER). In this study, we examined efficacy of VER in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI).

Design:

Repeated measures, within-subjects study.

Setting:

University laboratory in San Diego, CA.

Participants:

Ten individuals (age and injury duration = 33.3 ± 10.5 yr and 6.8 ± 6.2 yr) with SCI and 10 able-bodied (AB) individuals (age = 24.1 ± 7.4 yr).

Interventions:

Peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) was determined during INC on an arm ergometer followed by VER at 105 percent of peak power output (% PPO).

Outcome Measures:

Gas exchange data, heart rate (HR), and blood lactate concentration (BLa) were measured during exercise.

Results:

Across all participants, VO2peak was highly related between protocols (ICC = 0.98) and the mean difference was equal to 0.08 ± 0.11 L/min. Compared to INC, VO2peak from VER was not different in SCI (1.30 ± 0.45 L/min vs. 1.31 ± 0.43 L/min) but higher in AB (1.63 ± 0.40 L/min vs. 1.76 ± 0.40 L/min).

Conclusion:

Data show similar VO2peak between incremental and verification tests in SCI, suggesting that VER confirms VO2max attainment. However, in AB participants completing arm ergometry, VER is essential to validate appearance of ‘true’ VO2peak.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all participants for taking part in the protocol described in this study.

Disclaimer statements

Funding Funding was obtained for this project from a University GPSM grant, yet no federal funding (NIH, NSF, etc.) was obtained.

Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest in the completion of this study.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 184.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.