![Sample our Health and Social Care journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5938/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Health-Social-Care.jpg"})
Abstract
Introduction
Although medication-assisted treatment (MAT) effectively treats opioid use disorders (OUD), MAT access is restricted in criminal justice (CJ) settings. Previous studies have documented that stigma and limited knowledge about MAT are prevalent among CJ court personnel. We describe development and pilot testing of an eLearning intervention to improve MAT knowledge and increase MAT referrals in Ohio courts. Methods: Building upon a nationwide survey conducted in 2011 of drug courts and informed by MAT opinions from judges who supervised OUD clients, we developed two eLearning MAT modules. Judges completed a brief online MAT knowledge-attitude scale (K-A) before, after, and at 3 months. Judges were asked about MAT referrals pretest and 3 months later. Results: Sixty-three judges expressed interest in the study, 25 completed the pretest and viewed the modules, 11 completed a 3 month posttest. At pretest, K-A scores were significantly (p<.05) lower for agonist medications than for extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX; Vivitrol). K-A scores improved at posttest for agonist medications (p<.05) but declined to pretest levels three months later. Three months after the pretest, buprenorphine referrals increased from 2.6% to 9.7% (p<.05). There was no significant difference on K-A scores for agonist medication between the Ohio sample (at pretest) and the 2011 sample. Conclusion: Although there is some indication that eLearning may have strengthened knowledge gains and increased buprenorphine referrals, a more robust eLearning intervention will likely be required to increase court personnel participation and sustain eLearning knowledge gains. Recruiting and sustaining judges’ participation in the study represented a significant study limitation.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the judges and court personnel who generously participated in this study. We gratefully acknowledge the participation of the opinion leaders who took part in the educational modules, Dr. David Gastfriend, Dr. Josiah Rich, Dr. Alan Weiner, Dr. Douglas Marlowe, and the Honorable Judge Louis Presenza, as well as our educational module developer and editor, Nicole Matusow. This study would not have been possible without the expressed support and encouragement of the Supreme Court of Ohio.
Declaration of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the article.