Abstract
Objective
The objective of this study is to examine differences between; telehealth and in-person visits during COVID-19 and in a pre-COVID-19 reference period; COVID-19 televisit completion for patients with varying engagement in treatment during the reference period.
Methods
Electronic medical record data were collected and analyzed with chi-squared or t-tests to compare patient demographics. Generalized estimating equations for estimating the odds of outcomes were used, controlling for demographics.
Results
Patients were 3.34 and 1.74 times more likely to complete a telehealth visit (n = 11,839) compared with an in-person visit during (n = 7,917) and prior (n = 15,497) to COVID-19. For patients on buprenorphine, patients with no prior in-person visits during the pre-televisit period were 2.26 more likely to complete televisits compared with patients with two or more prior in-person visits. For all patients, those with two or more prior in-person visits in the reference period were 1.27 times more likely to complete a televisit compared with a patient with no in-person visits during the pre-televisit period. There was no significant difference when comparing with patients who had only one prior in-person visit to those patients with no prior visits.
Conclusions
In this study, outpatient substance use disorder (SUD) telehealth appointments were associated with higher odds of visit completion compared with in-person visits during and prior to COVID-19. Patients receiving buprenorphine, without prior in person visits, were more likely to attend if they did not have in-person visits prior to COVID-19. Regulators should consider permanently adopting telehealth flexibilities for SUD treatment once the federal emergency status has ended.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to acknowledge Juan Garcia and Emily Carter for their assistance and all of the NYC Health and Hospitals employees on the front lines during COVID-19.
Declaration of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the article.
Funding
The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.