417
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: What do we Know about the Role of Occupational and Environmental Determinants? A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis

, , , , ORCID Icon, & show all
Pages 372-392 | Published online: 17 Oct 2022
 

ABSTRACT

The objectives of this systematic review of original articles published up until August 2021 and meta-analyses were to identify the links between occupational and non-occupational environmental exposures, types of occupations and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Sixteen selected case-control studies were qualified as good level with Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale. Sensitivity analyses highlighted the role of choice of control group, tobacco adjustment and diagnostic tools. Significantly increased risks of IPF were observed (OR (95%CI): for metals (1.42(1.05–1.92)), wood (OR:1.32(1.02–1.71)), and general dust (OR:1.32(1.08–1.63)) exposures. Subgroup analyses found a significantly elevated risk for: hardwood (OR:1.75 (1.13–2.70)), organic dusts (OR:1.72 (1.20–2.46)) and pesticides (OR:2.30 (1.30–4.08)), while no significant change was noted for softwoods and solvents. Smoking adjustments: general dust (1.45 (1.04–2.03)/organic dust (2.5 (1.49–4.22)/metals (1.87 (1.16–3)/wood dust OR: 1.16 (0.86–1.61)/pesticide exposure 2.4 (0.84–6.9) were calculated. Among agricultural workers, the risk was also increased (OR:2.06 (1.02–4.16)). Few environmental data were available and no significant associations detected. Thus, these meta-analyses highlighted the role of some occupational exposures in IPF occurrence. A more accurate and thorough assessment of exposures over the entire working life as well as on the duration and intensity of exposure and complex of multi-pollutant exposure is needed in future research and clinical practice.

Graphical Abstract

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, [YE], upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Professor Marie-Pierre Baduel (English teacher) for her help in proofreading the article.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Author Contributions

Conception and design: Y.E. AC; Methodology: Y.E. AP; Review of literature: AP, CG, AC. Formal analysis: Y.E, AP; Substantial contributions to interpretation of data and have been involved in revising the manuscript it critically for important intellectual content: JCP, IB, AD; Writing and editing: YE, AP.

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2022.2131663

Additional information

Funding

No sponsor and specific funding had a role in this systematic review and meta-analysis.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 396.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.