The Efficacy of Anti-Corruption Institutions in Italy

Abstract

The efficacy of an institution must be measured against the challenges it faces. In Italy, anti-corruption institutions face considerable obstacles, including weak national government, strong local loyalties, and deeply-rooted cultural factors. However, in recent years, Italy has made serious and effective efforts to combat corruption. The massive Tangentopoli scandal of 1992 discredited all major political parties in Italy at the time, but also sharply diminished public tolerance of corruption. As a result, Italy finally adopted many of the anti-corruption measures that had long been pressed on it by international treaties and conventions. The creation and gradually increased empowerment of Italy's National Anti-Corruption Authority (ANAC), beginning in 2009, has begun to alter the culture of Italian bureaucracy. Italy's legal system, its Court of Auditors, and its Guardia di Finanza, perhaps in response to competition from ANAC, have also become more energetic in their efforts to fight corruption. While corruption remains a very serious problem, and by some measures has even worsened in some ways, Italy's anti-corruption institutions are not ineffective.

Keywords:

• Italy
• anti-corruption
• legal system
• Court of Auditors
• National Anti-Corruption Authority

Note

Notes

1 Most of my research for this article was conducted under the auspices of the Institute for the Study of Regionalism, Federalism, and Self-government of the National Research Council of Italy during the fall of 2018. I am deeply grateful for the assistance of its director, Professor Stelio Mangiameli, and its staff. I am also grateful for the valuable contribution of my fall 2017 research assistant, Mr. Salomon Montaguth. In addition, I am happy to thank the Office for Advancement of Research of John Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New York, for a grant that funded part of this work. Opinions expressed are those of the author only, as are any errors.