Does ecological marginality reflect physiological marginality in plants?

Abstract

In the absence of barriers to dispersal, species’ range limits should arise when physiological processes are compromised by unfavorable ecological conditions. This study aims to fill the knowledge gap on the role of physiology in determining plant species range limits. We developed the Physiological Marginality Hypothesis (PMH), a theoretical framework predicting that individuals in ecologically marginal populations are less physiologically efficient than those occurring at the ecological optimum. According to PMH, the probability to reach the optimal physiological efficiency is best shaped by a Gaussian function and curvilinear relationships should exist between physiological traits and ecological gradients. We conducted an analysis on plant physiology studies along altitudinal/latitudinal gradients to investigate which models best describe the relationship between the performance of a given physiological trait and the considered ecological gradients. Data from 54 cases (29 species) concerning photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, carbon isotope composition and photosynthetic water use efficiency were used. Overall, results support PMH in about 70% of cases, suggesting that ecologically marginal individuals can be physiologically less efficient than individuals occurring at the species ecological optimum. Physiology has an important causal role in shaping plant species distribution and further studies should focus on physiological processes at the ecological range edge.

Keywords:

• Elevation
• ecological gradients
• marginal populations
• latitude
• plant physiology
• range edge

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Prof. R. Gerdol (University of Ferrara, Italy), Prof. K. Taulavuori (University of Oulu, Finland) and Prof. G. Rossi and Dr. S. Orsenigo (University of Pavia, Italy) for their important suggestions on an early version of the manuscript. The Grant of Excellence Departments, MIUR-Italy (ARTICOLO 1, COMMI 314 – 337 LEGGE 232/2016) is gratefully acknowledged for the support to one of the authors (Prof. Thomas Abeli).

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Correction Statement

This article has been republished with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.