104
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Forest Health

Importance of large-diameter conifer snags for saproxylic beetle (Cerambycidae) assemblages in old-growth remnants in Japan

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 112-122 | Received 27 Mar 2023, Accepted 30 Aug 2023, Published online: 23 Sep 2023
 

ABSTRACT

Conversion of old-growth forests to managed forests reduces the amount and variety of dead wood, particularly large snags (standing dead trees) are disappeared. Therefore, organisms that rely on large snags are considered to be severely affected by forest practices that convert old-growth forests to managed forests. We examined the effect of snag characteristics (diameter, bark cover, and decay gradient) on longicorn beetle (Cerambycidae) assemblages to search for species that prefer large-diameter snags in two old-growth remnants in a cool-temperate mixed forest and a sub-boreal conifer forest in Hokkaido, Japan. We collected beetles using window traps attached to conifer snags belonging to genus Abies and Picea and evaluated how snag characteristics affected beetles that feed on conifers with considering spatial autocorrelation. Species richness and total abundance were not associated with any of the snag characteristics. However, permutation tests in redundancy analysis revealed that snag diameter and bark cover affected species composition in the mixed forest, while only snag diameter had a significant effect in the conifer forest. Two (Macroleptura regalis and Prionus insularis insularis) and one (Sachalinobia koltzei) species preferred large-diameter snags in the mixed forest and the conifer forest, respectively. These species should be used as conservation targets to reduce the impacts of forest practices on saproxylic beetles. In contrast, one species (Molorchus minor fuscus) preferred small-diameter snags in the conifer forest. To conserve species that rely on large snags, we should maintain large snags in harvesting operations and retain large living trees for the future recruitment of large snags.

Acknowledgements

We thank S. Ishibashi and S. Iida for providing information on the study sites, T. Yoshihisa and K. Sakakibara for collecting insects and helping fieldwork, and A. Komatsu for sorting insect samples.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Supplementary data

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/13416979.2023.2257464

Additional information

Funding

This study was supported by JSPS KAKENHI grant number JP25252030.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 159.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.