ABSTRACT
The increasing conditionality of access to social protection on claimants’ proven willingness to seek and accept work has been one of the major dimensions of welfare state transformation of recent decades. Our understanding of the political determinants behind this trend, however, remains insufficient. This article assesses the state-of-the-art of political research on benefit work conditionality; points out a series of gaps and inconsistencies in existing research; and formulates an agenda for renewed and intensified research on the politics of work conditionality reforms, highlighting also how this research would contribute to important debates in welfare state research and political economy more generally.
Acknowledgements
I am grateful to Flavia Fossati as well as the two anonymous referees for their helpful comments on earlier drafts.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Notes
1 The ‘regulation approach’ has also been criticised on empirical grounds (Vis, Citation2007).
2 See e.g. the reviews by Starke (Citation2006) or Myles and Quadagno (Citation2002).
Additional information
Funding
Notes on contributors
Carlo Michael Knotz
Carlo Knotz is SNSF Postdoctoral Researcher at the Swiss Graduate School for Public Administration in Lausanne.