142
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Forthcoming Special Issue on: Visual Search and Selective Attention

Distractor rejection in parallel search tasks takes time but does not benefit from context repetitionFootnote*

, , , &
Pages 609-625 | Received 18 Mar 2019, Accepted 27 Sep 2019, Published online: 10 Oct 2019
 

ABSTRACT

When the spatial configuration of a search display is presented repeatedly, response times to finding the target within that configuration are shorter compared to completely novel configurations, even though observers do not have explicit recognition of the repetition. This phenomenon is known as Contextual Cueing and selective attention is thought to be necessary for the effect. Previous research has suggested that repetition of the context of unattended items does not appear to improve performance; only repetition of attended items does. It has been proposed that this occurs because unattended items are pre-attentively filtered and thus do not contribute to performance. Here we demonstrate that so-called “unattended” items do contribute to performance, just not to contextual cueing. We approach this question from the perspective of the parallel processing of the scene that unfolds at the start of each item and that has been recently modelled by the Target Contrast Signal Theory. We show that the processing time per item during parallel evaluation of the scene is not affected by context repetition, suggesting that the locations of the items rejected in this stage are not integrated into the memory representation underlying contextual cueing. Other alternatives are also discussed.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

* The data that support the findings of this study are openly available on the Open Science Framework at http://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/ZWXBH, reference number ZWXBH.

1 Jiang and Chun (Citation2001) referred to these as the “attended” and “unattended” color respectively. However, we prefer to use the term “candidate” to describe a distractor that is very similar to the target such that selective attention is required to distinguish it from the target, and the term “lure” to describe a distractor that is sufficiently different from the target such that the visual system can distinguish it from the target in peripheral vision without the need for focused selective attention (Buetti et al., Citation2016; Lleras, Buetti, & Mordkoff, Citation2013; Neider & Zelinsky, Citation2008).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 238.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.