Cognitive reappraisal, emotional suppression, and depressive and anxiety symptoms in later life: The moderating role of gender

Abstract

Objectives

Although socioemotional selectivity (SST) suggests that people experience more positive affect as they age, symptoms of anxiety and depression persist and are often greater in older women than men. Coping strategies may influence the extent to which older adults experience these symptoms. The purpose of the current study is to examine possible gender differences in the use of an adaptive (cognitive reappraisal (CR) and a maladaptive (emotive suppression (ES) emotion regulation strategy in relation to depressive and anxiety symptoms.

Method

Our study uses cross-sectional data drawn from a community sample of older adults (60+; n = 906). We used OLS regression and moderation analyses to test our study hypotheses.

Results

Gender moderated the association between CR in both depressive and anxiety symptoms. Women reported greater use of CR relative to men. Further, CR use was negatively related to symptoms of anxiety and depression in women, but not men. In contrast, men used ES more frequently than women, though older men and women’s use of ES was unrelated to anxiety or depressive symptoms.

Conclusion

Our findings provide initial evidence that greater CR use in older women is related to lower symptoms of both anxiety and depression relative to older men. Age-related increases in CR use (e.g. SST) among women may serve to decrease anxiety and depression symptoms. Findings suggest decreasing anxiety and depressive symptoms via CR may benefit older women more than older men. Future research is needed to identify the coping strategies that are most beneficial for men.

Keywords:

• Cognitive reappraisal
• depression
• anxiety

Acknowledgements

The authors have no Acknowledgements. Data may be made available upon request. The current study was not preregistered.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Institute for Successful Aging (Florida State University) Grant number OMNI 089009-550-000473.