203
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

A Practical Approach of Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis for Vector IMs Regarding Mainshock with Potentially Largest Aftershock

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 637-658 | Received 06 Oct 2022, Accepted 15 May 2023, Published online: 29 May 2023
 

ABSTRACT

Seismic hazard and risk may be underestimated if aftershocks are ignored within the traditional probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA). In this study, a practical approach is proposed to calculate the mean annual rate of the joint exceedance of different ground motion vector intensity measures (IMs) for mainshocks and their potentially largest aftershock. The proposed approach is built based on an indirect vector-valued PSHA framework, which was originally used to compute the joint hazard of multiple IMs for mainshocks. Within the proposed approach, the overall hazard caused by mainshock-aftershock scenarios is calculated by including two key components, namely: 1) the occurrence rate of a given hazard level of mainshock as calculated by the standard PSHA; and 2) the occurrence probability of a given hazard level of aftershock conditioned on the mainshock, which is calculated by establishing the joint distribution of the IMs for both mainshocks and aftershocks using the Copula theory. Based on 662 groups of mainshock-aftershock ground motions from 13 earthquake events in the NGA-West2 database, the empirical joint probability distribution model between the peak ground accelerations of mainshocks and aftershocks (i.e. PGAMS and PGAAS) is developed. The Clayton Copula function is calibrated as the optimal choice and the marginal distributions of PGAMS or PGAAS could be properly modelled using the generalized extreme value distributions. The proposed approach is implemented to construct the joint hazard surface regarding both PGAMS and PGAAS for a hypothetical site. The results indicate that using different types of copula functions and marginal distributions of PGAMS and PGAAS has a noticeable impact on the final joint hazard level. Moreover, a coarse assumption that PGAMS and PGAAS follow a joint Gaussian distribution in the logarithm scale would lead to considerable bias in the mainshock-aftershock joint hazard especially at low mean annual rates of exceedance.

Disclosure Statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data and Resource

Mainshock and Aftershock recordings used in this study were derived from PEER Ground Motion Database at https://ngawest2.berkeley.edu/.

Additional information

Funding

This research is supported in part by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2022M710333]; the Scientific Research Fund of Multi-Functional Shaking Tables Laboratory of Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture [2021MFSTL04]; the National Science Foundation of China [52078176]. Opinions and findings presented are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsor.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 258.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.