Abstract
The Chinese national emergency warning system has been officially launched since 2015 to provide multi-hazard warnings to the public, but its efficiency and effectiveness remain unclear. Based on a dataset of 914 samples collected short after a hazardous convective weather event in Qingdao, this paper investigates the dissemination efficiency and behavior-changing effectiveness of various warning communication approaches used in the Chinese system. The results show that the total reception rate of meteorological warnings was 36%, yet to be improved. Out of the three communication approaches, direct transmission by officials was the most effective in fostering risk perception and stimulating behavior, but exhibited the lowest dissemination efficiency. Social diffusion also played a vital role in warning dissemination, followed by media relaying, but both lacked cognitive and behavioral effectiveness. Environmental cues served as an important source supplemental to meteorological warnings, but were subject to a high level of uncertainty and inconsistency. Finally, gender, age and education level of the warning recipients were found to influence the dissemination efficiency and behavioral effectiveness of the three warning approaches to varied extent. These results are partially consistent with previous findings in countries with well-developed warning systems, but shed light on the areas for further improvement of the Chinese warning system, as well as the establishment of efficient and effective new warning systems in other contexts.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Notes
1 12379 is the unified code and name used for the hotline, website, and mobile APP of Chinese National Emergency Warning Information Publishing Network, and thus referred to as the short name for the system in this paper.
2 This statistic was for the whole city of Qingdao, based on the 6th national census conducted in 2010. In comparison, the percentage of residents with college degrees and above should be higher in the urban area of Qingdao (i.e. the sampled area), but such a statistic was not revealed publicly.