565
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review article

Medicalisation, risk and the use of statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a scoping review of the literature

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 390-406 | Received 27 Aug 2018, Accepted 11 Sep 2019, Published online: 23 Sep 2019
 

Abstract

Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease has been a site of medicalisation, as demonstrated by the significant increase in the use of cholesterol-lowering drugs, statins, over the last thirty years. While this is welcomed by many in the medical community, others have criticised the expansion of statin use to low-risk people. In the context of this debate, the aim of this article is to present a broad scoping review of the literature on how preventative health, risk and ‘candidacy’ for statin treatment are perceived and negotiated by clinicians and patients. We examine how evidence and knowledge about cardiovascular risk reduction is produced, interpreted and communicated and how patients’ gender, socio-demographic and cultural differences may impact patterns of statin use. We found that few studies differentiated between the use of statins in those with and those without established cardiovascular disease, despite the fact that the majority of statin users, and women in particular, fall into the primary prevention category. In this context, the process of medicalisation is predicated on healthy individuals being subject to medical surveillance of risk factors, which have acquired the status of disease in their own right. Central to this process has been the heuristic that identifies elevated cholesterol as a medical problem warranting statin treatment, as well as the difficulties encountered by doctors and patients in understanding, interpreting and communicating risk. This individualised construction of risk and disease has largely ignored the supposedly widely recognised social and political determinants of health and illness.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the This study is part of PB’s PhD which is funded by the SPHeRE Health Research Board structured PhD programme [SPHeRE/2013/1].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 238.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.