Abstract
Objective
Lethal means safety is an effective suicide prevention strategy with demonstrated results at the population level, yet individual-level uptake is less well understood.
Methods
Using automated data extraction methods, we conducted an investigation of electronic health records from psychiatric emergency service (PES) patients from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2017 at a busy urban medical center in the Pacific Northwest. At each PES mental health evaluation, every patient received a Suicide Risk Assessment during which providers used an electronic template with standardized fields to record lethal means access and other suicide risk factors.
Results
We assessed 32,658 records belonging to 15,652 patients. Among all visits, 69.9% (n = 22,824) had some documentation of lethal means assessment. However, 54.1% (n = 17,674) of all visits lacked some or all potential documentation detail. Additionally, among 59.6% of visits in which a patient had documented access to lethal means, the specific means available were not indicated. Across the twenty risk and demographic factors we assessed, the prevalence of documentation did not vary by any given risk factor and only varied minimally by age and race. For example, when comparing visits which indicated family history of suicide to those which indicated no family history of suicide, the prevalence ratio was 0.99 (95% CI: 0.95, 1.03).
Conclusion
Despite the high-risk patient population, mental health focus of the facility, and the presence of a standardized tool, lethal means documentation was suboptimal. In alignment with recent recommendations, our findings indicate that additional focus on implementation is needed to improve documentation of lethal means assessment.
Fifteen times larger than prior comparable studies
Findings demonstrate persistent under-documentation patterns in new setting and region
Standardized methods likely needed to improve documentation detail and frequency
Highlights
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are grateful to the University of Washington’s Center for Studies in Demography and Ecology for use of their computing resources.
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
The authors declare no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
Additional information
Funding
Notes on contributors
Anne E. Massey
Anne E. Massey, Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Firearm Injury and Policy Research Program, Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Paul Borghesani
Paul Borghesani, Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jennifer Stuber
Jennifer Stuber, School of Social Work, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Forefront Suicide Prevention, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Anna Ratzliff
Anna Ratzliff, Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Advancing Integrated Mental Health Solutions Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Frederick P. Rivara
Frederick P. Rivara, Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Firearm Injury and Policy Research Program, Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA; Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Ali Rowhani-Rahbar
Ali Rowhani-Rahbar, Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Firearm Injury and Policy Research Program, Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA; Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.