213
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Clinical Issues

A psychometric examination of the PAI-SF in persons with recent stroke

, , , , , & show all
Pages 1471-1492 | Received 03 Apr 2020, Accepted 25 Sep 2020, Published online: 15 Oct 2020
 

Abstract

Objective: The present study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Personality Assessment Inventory-Short Form (PAI-SF) for use with patients with recent stroke. Method: Study participants (N = 170) were inpatients in a tertiary hospital in Western Canada admitted to a rehabilitation department who completed a neuropsychological evaluation as part of their care. All participants completed the full-form of the PAI (344 items) and both full- and short-form (160 items) versions were scored from the same protocol. Results: Internal consistency for the PAI-SF scales was assessed by Cronbach's coefficient alpha. Alpha coefficients for clinical scales fell between the range of 0.53 (ANT) to 0.88 (ANX), with three scales (ANT, ALC, and DRG) falling below satisfactory (<0.70). Alpha coefficients were unsatisfactory for validity, treatment, and interpersonal scales. Absolute differences between mean clinical scale t scores between the full and short-form PAI clinical scales ranged from 0.04 (DEP) to 1.18 (MAN). For an individual, absolute differences in scale t scores between the full- and short-forms ranged from 0 to 30 t scores. On average, an individual varied 3.75 t scores between the PAI full- and short-form across all validity, clinical, interpersonal, and treatment scales. Component structure was similar across the full- and short-forms. Conclusions: Findings are somewhat consistent with previous literature on the PAI-SF as the full- and short-forms had minimal differences and similar psychometric properties. However, caution is warranted for the clinical utility for both forms given the lower alpha coefficients and different structure. Only certain clinical scales appear to have strong psychometric properties.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Neuropsychology Department at Kelowna General Hospital, the PLAN lab members, and the volunteers who aided in coding data, Alexandra Schuester, Jason Scott, Tarnjeet Uppal, and Lydia Wood.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

1 Scale abbreviations: Validity scales (Infrequency [INF]; Positive Impression Management [PIM]; Negative Impression Management [NIM]); Clinical scales (Somatic Complaints [SOM]; Anxiety [ANX]; Anxiety Related Disorders [ARD]; Depression [DEP]; Mania [MAN]; Paranoia [PAR]; Schizophrenia [SCZ]; Borderline Features [BOR]; Antisocial Features [ANT]; Alcohol Problems [ALC]; and Drug Problems [DRG]); interpersonal scales (Dominance [DOM], and Warmth [WRM]); treatment consideration scales (Aggression [AGG], Suicidal Ideation [SUI], Stress [STR], Non-support [NON], and Treatment Rejection [RXR]).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 462.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.