350
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Clinical Issues

Virtuous victims: Disability claimants who over- and under-report

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1584-1607 | Received 05 Dec 2022, Accepted 23 Feb 2023, Published online: 08 Mar 2023
 

Abstract

Objective: The present study was the first to investigate the test performance and symptom reports of individuals who engage in both over-reporting (i.e., exaggerating or fabricating symptoms) and under-reporting (i.e., exaggerating positive qualities or denying shortcomings) in the context of a forensic evaluation. We focused on comparing individuals who over- and under-reported (OR + UR) with those who only over-reported (OR-only) on the MMPI-3. Method: Using a disability claimant sample referred for comprehensive psychological evaluations (n = 848), the present study first determined the rates of possible over-reporting (MMPI-3 F ≥ 75 T, Fp ≥ 70 T, Fs ≥ 100 T, or FBS or RBS ≥ 90 T) with (n = 42) and without (n = 332) under-reporting (L ≥ 65 T). Next, we examined group mean differences on MMPI-3 substantive scale scores and scores on several additional measures completed by the disability claimant sample during their evaluation. Results: The small group of individuals identified as both over-reporting and under-reporting (OR + UR) scored meaningfully higher than the OR-only group on several over- and under-reporting symptom validity tests, as well as on measures of emotional and cognitive/somatic complaints, but lower on externalizing measures. The OR + UR group also performed significantly worse than the OR-only group on several performance validity tests and measures of cognitive ability. Conclusions: The present study indicated that disability claimants who engage in simultaneous over- and under-reporting portray themselves as having greater levels of dysfunction but fewer externalizing tendencies relative to claimants who only over-report; however, these portrayals are likely less accurate reflections of their true functioning.

Disclosure statement

Regarding conflicts of interest, Roger O. Gervais receives scoring support for the MMPI-2-RF/MMPI-3 from the MMPI-3 test publisher, the University of Minnesota Press, and distributor, Pearson Assessments. Yossef S. Ben-Porath receives research funding from the University of Minnesota Press. As co-author of the MMPI-3, he receives royalties on sales of the test.

Additional information

Funding

The statements and opinions in this article are those of the authors. This research is grant-funded by the University of Minnesota Press. Regarding conflicts of interest, Roger O. Gervais receives scoring support for the MMPI-2-RF/MMPI-3 from the MMPI-3 test publisher, the University of Minnesota Press, and distributor, Pearson Assessments. Yossef S. Ben-Porath receives research funding from the University of Minnesota Press. As co-author of the MMPI-3, he receives royalties on sales of the test. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 462.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.