839
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Doing peer work in mental health services: Unpacking different enactments of lived experiences

Pages 32-46 | Received 07 Apr 2020, Accepted 10 Nov 2020, Published online: 19 Jan 2021
 

ABSTRACT

Mental health services are increasingly employing peer workers (PWs), individuals who have lived experiences with mental health problems, to support patients and be part of mental health care teams. While the employment of PWs continues to increase, little is known about how the function unfolds in practice. This paper explores the broader context in which the PWs navigate and the concrete outcomes and everyday issues that exist at the individual level. Methodologically, the paper draws on 22 interviews with PWs employed in the mental health services in Denmark. Theoretically, it combines Lipsky’s (1980) theory on street-level bureaucrats with sociological discussions concerning the lay-expert divide. The analysis shows that PWs experience both role ambiguity and goal uncertainty and that they use substantial discretion in determining the nature, amount and quality of their peer practices. This – combined with the PWs’ diverse lived experiences – calls for a heterogeneous understanding of peer work and therefore the analysis presents three categories of peer workers: PWs as (1) a representative of patients’ lifeworld, (2) an interdisciplinary professional and (3) an ‘expert by experience’. These categories display PWs different enactments of their lived experiences and reveal ambiguities tied to the lay-expert divide.

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to the peer workers that have participated in the study. Without your commitment and thoughtfulness, this study would not have been possible. In addition, I would like to thank Darin Weinberg, Margaretha Järvinen and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on earlier versions of this paper.

Data availability statement

Research data are not shared due to privacy and ethical restrictions.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Independent Research Fund Denmark under grant number [DFF – 6119-00009].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 708.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.