1,106
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

‘Moralising’ Welfare and migration in austerity Britain: a backdrop to Brexit

Pages 76-100 | Received 06 Feb 2017, Accepted 01 Feb 2018, Published online: 08 Mar 2018
 

ABSTRACT

This article begins by examining UK government discourse on welfare and migration for the period 2010–2016, viewed here as the expression of a distinctive process of moralisation. This discourse is characterised by claims to fairness, responsibility, and austerity, and explicitly sets domestic welfare dependency and migration in opposition to each other. Its operationalisation is traced through a formal mapping of civic stratification in relation to both domestic welfare and freedom of movement within the European Union, while also noting the absence of supporting empirical evidence. The article then looks to the informal aspect of civic stratification, and the role of political discourse in negatively shaping the moral standing of both domestic welfare recipients and EU migrants. Together with the uneven impact of welfare reform, their discursive opposition provides an important amplification of common understandings of the Brexit vote as delivered by the ‘left behind’ (Goodwin, M. and Heath, D. (2016) ‘The 2016 Referendum, Brexit and the Left Behind’, The Political Quarterly 87(3): 323–332).

Disclosure statement

No financial interests or benefits have arisen from the research in this paper.

Notes on contributor

Lydia Morris holds a Bachelor's degree in Sociology and Politics from Keele University, and a PhD in Anthropology from the London School of Economics. She has worked as a researcher for Lambeth Council, and at Swansea University, and as a lecturer at Durham University and the University of Essex. She was made a Professor at Essex in 1995 and was Head of the Department from 2001 to 2004.

Notes

4 An estimated 2% of total claims.

8 Currently being phased-in, to integrate Job Seekers Allowance, Housing Benefit, Working Tax Credit, Child Tax Credit, Employment Support Allowance (for the disabled), and Income Support (for the economically inactive).

9 See note 7.

10 E.g. differential requirements for participation in the Work Programme.

15 Immigration (European Economic Area) (Amendment) Regulations 2014 (SI 2014/1511) and SI (2014/2761).

18 http://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/CBP-7445 The main working age benefits are JSA (for unemployment), ESA (for disability) and Income Support (for economically inactive).

25 53.4% in England, with Scotland and Northern Ireland supporting Remain (Sensier and Devine Citation2017).

26 An electoral unit of average population 7000, analysed by Becker et al (Citation2016) for four cities.

27 Prior support for the UK Independence Party or the British National Party.

30 Notably the Scottish vote (62 per cent Remain) displayed a different pattern of response.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by Leverhulme Trust [grant number MRF-2015-012].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.