ABSTRACT
Focusing on Hong Kong’s news media, this study uses the concepts of news paradigms and information subsidies to examine how a shift in political power centers can affect the production of political news and its reportage. A quantitative content analysis of the sourcing patterns of press reports on interpretations of the Basic Law by the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress after the 1997 handover of Hong Kong indicated a rising trend in the use of news sources from the Chinese government and the pro-China camp. Furthermore, in-depth interviews with Hong Kong political journalists revealed that the influence of the Chinese government on the media exceeded that of the Hong Kong government. The currently asymmetrical dual-power structure, which is characterized by the Chinese central government’s supersession of the Hong Kong government, has provoked dramatic changes in news sources and sourcing practices, reflecting a shift in Hong Kong’s news paradigm. Media outlets and journalists face resistance to their news reporting and threats to the professionalism of their journalistic work.
Disclosure Statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Notes
1 The Communist Party newspapers included the Hong Kong Commercial Daily, Ta Kung Pao, and Wen Wei Po. The pro-establishment press included Oriental Daily, Sing Tao Daily, Hong Kong Economic Times, and Sing Pao. The neutral press included Ming Pao and Hong Kong Economic Journal. The radically pro-democratic press included Apple Daily.
2 Online news media included HK01, Standnews, and Citizen News. Local broadcast news media included TVB, Cable TV, RTHK, and Now TV.
3 Codes were assigned according to the sequence in which the interviews were conducted.
4 In this context, leftists are those who have a strong orientation to traditional socialist values. They follow Marxist doctrines and oppose market-driven reforms (Chen Citation1999).
5 Pan, Z. & Chan, J. M. (2003). Shifting journalistic paradigms: How China’s journalists assess “media exemplars.” Communication Research, 30(6), 650.