ABSTRACT
The cultural, legal, budgetary, infrastructural, and logistical processes through which the contemporary space race unfolds have measurable environmental footprints on Earth and in outer space. The question of where these footprints fall is arbitrated by larger questions of geopolitical power and vulnerability, which means that human engagement with outer space is also a question of environmental justice. On Earth, environmental (in)justice unfolds on multiple scales: local and stratospheric emissions from space launches, the placement of outer space related infrastructure in so-called peripheral places, and the role of power in determining whether the use of such infrastructure aids socio-environmentally constructive or destructive practices. Beyond Earth, the environmental geopolitics are likewise multiscalar, manifesting in contemporary pollution issues such as orbital debris and conservation debates such as planetary protection protocols. The environmental geopolitics of Earth and outer space are inextricably linked by the spatial politics of privilege and the imposition of sacrifice – among people, places, and institutions. This paper explores the concept of outer space environments through classical, critical, environmental, and feminist geopolitical theories.
Acknowledgments
The author thanks three anonymous reviewers and the editors at Geopolitics for their in-depth engagement with this manuscript; to the participants at the Outer Space sessions at the Annual Meeting of the American Association of Geographers in 2015 – 2018, to Danny Bednar, Rory Rowan, Casey Lynch, Julie Saperstein, Oliver Dunnett, Andrew Maclaren, and Kate Sammler for their comments on early versions of this article, and to Avery Hall for research assistance. Funding support for workshops and conference travel provided by the Boston University Career Development Professorship.
Notes
2. This mirrors moves in other domains of feminist geopolitical inquiry to examine domestic violence and contemporary international warfare in relation to each other, challenging the “big”/”little” distinction as it plays out between “big” domains of warfare and “little” spaces of intimate partner violence (Pain Citation2014; Pain and Staeheli Citation2014).
3. There is some interest in developing Green propellants (Bombelli et al. Citation2003; Gohardani et al. Citation2014).
4. Environmental justice literature is replete with illustrative cases (Auyero and Swistun Citation2009; Brown et al. Citation2003; Bullard Citation1996). As for noise pollution, there is currently no standard environmental assessment methodology to evaluate the impact of launch vehicles and sites (Sizov Citation2017), despite abundant research on the social and environmental impacts of aircraft noise pollution on humans and other animals (Ellis, Ellis, and Mindell Citation1991; Richardson et al. Citation1995; Yankaskas Citation2013).
5. The Moon is approximately four hundred thousand kilometers away from Earth. Although it is also in Earth’s orbits, its influence on satellites and launch trajectories is less immediate than the material between lower Earth and Geostationary orbits.
6. For race and gender analyses of human engagement with outer space, see, inter alia: Bell and Parker (Citation2009), Bryld and Lykke (Citation2000), Dick and Launius (Citation2007), Dickens and Ormrod (Citation2016), Horner et al. (Citation2015), Jennings and Baker (Citation2000), Kilgore and Douglas (Citation2003), Lathers (Citation2012), Litfin (Citation1997), Llinares (Citation2011), Messeri (Citation2017), McQuaid (Citation2007), Penley (Citation1997), Pesterfield (Citation2016), Sage (Citation2009), Shetterly (Citation2016), Valentine (Citation2012), and Weitekamp (Citation2004).
Battaglia, D. 2017. Aeroponic gardens and their magic: Plants/persons/ethics in suspension. History and Anthropology 28 (3):263–92. doi:10.1080/02757206.2017.1289935. Messeri, L. R. 2016. Placing outer space: An earthly ethnography of other worlds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Olson, V. 2018. Into the extreme: U.S. environmental systems and politics beyond earth. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Valentine, D. 2012. Exit strategy: Profit, cosmology, and the future of humans in space. Anthropological Quarterly 85 (4):1045–67. doi:10.1353/anq.2012.0073. Bertoni, F. 2016. Resources (Un)Ltd: Of planets, mining, and biogeochemical togetherness. In Environmental humanities: Voices from the anthropocene, ed. S. Oppermann and S. Iovino, 175–92. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield. Boes, T. 2014. Beyond whole earth: Planetary mediation and the anthropocene. Environmental Humanities 5 (155):70–89. doi:10.1215/22011919-3615460. Latour, B. 2015. Telling friends from foes in the time of the anthropocene. In The Anthropocene and the global environmental crisis: Rethinking modernity in a new epoch, ed. C. Hamilton, C. Bonneuil, and F. Gemenne, 145–155. London: Routledge. Olson, V., and L. Messeri. 2015. Beyond the anthropocene: Un-earthing an epoch. Environment and Society: Advances in Research 6 (1):28–47. doi:10.3167/ares.2015.060103. Salazar, J. F. 2017a. Antarctica and outer space: Relational trajectories. The Polar Journal 7 (2):259–69. doi:10.1080/2154896X.2017.1398521. Aronowsky, L. V. 2017. Of astronauts and algae: Nasa and the dream of multispecies spaceflight. Environmental Humanities 2017 (9):2. Helmreich, S. 2017. Foreword: A wrinkle in space. Environmental Humanities 9 (2):300–08. doi:10.1215/22011919-4215306. Messeri, L. 2017. Gestures of cosmic relation and the search for another Earth. Environmental Humanities 9 (2):325–40. doi:10.1215/22011919-4215325. Praet, I., and J. F. Salazar. 2017. Introduction: Familiarizing the extraterrestrial/Making our planet alien. Environmental Humanities 9 (2):309–24. doi:10.1215/22011919-4215315. Salazar, J. F. 2017b. Microbial geographies at the extremes of life. Environmental Humanities 9 (2):398–417. doi:10.1215/22011919-4215361. Beery, J. 2016b. Unearthing global natures: Outer space and scalar politics. Political Geography 55 (November):92–101. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2016.04.003. Gabrys, J. 2016. Program earth: The making of a computational planet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Jasanoff, S. 2004. Heaven and earth: The politics of environmental images. In Earthly politics: Local and global in environmental governance, ed. S. Jasanoff and M. L. Martello, 31–52. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Gorman, A. 2005. The cultural landscape of interplanetary space. Journal of Social Archaeology 5 (1):85–107. doi:10.1177/1469605305050148. Pain, R. 2014. Gendered violence: Rotating intimacy. Area 46 (4):351–53. doi:10.1111/area.12138_4. Pain, R., and L. Staeheli. 2014. Introduction: Intimacy-geopolitics and violence. Area 46 (4):344–60. doi:10.1111/area.12138. Bombelli, V., D. Simon, J.-L. Moerel, and T. Marée. 2003. Economic benefits of the use of non-toxic mono-propellants for spacecraft applications. Huntsville, Alabama: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautices. Gohardani, A. S., J. Stanojev, A. Demairé, K. Anflo, M. Persson, N. Wingborg, and C. Nilsson. 2014. Green space propulsion: Opportunities and prospects. Progress in Aerospace Sciences 71 (Nov):128–49. doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2014.08.001. Auyero, J., and D. A. Swistun. 2009. Flammable: Environmental suffering in an argentine shantytown. New York: Oxford University Press. Brown, P., B. Mayer, S. Zavestoski, T. Luebke, J. Mandelbaum, and S. McCormick. 2003. The health politics of asthma: Environmental justice and collective illness experience in the United States. Social Science and Medicine 57 (3):453–64. Bullard, R. D. 1996. Environmental Justice: It’s more than waste facility siting. Social Science Quarterly 77 (3):493–99. Sizov, N. 2017. Commercial space operations noise and sonic boom issues. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 141:3625. doi:10.1121/1.4987790. Ellis, D. H., C. H. Ellis, and D. P. Mindell. 1991. Raptor responses to low-level jet aircraft and sonic booms. Environmental Pollution 74 (1):53–83. Richardson, W. J., C. R. Greene Jr., C. I. Malme, D. H. Thomson, S. E. Moore, and W. Bernd. 1995. Marine mammals and noise. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Yankaskas, K. 2013. Prelude: Noise-induced tinnitus and hearing loss in the military. Hearing Research 295 (January`):3–8. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2012.04.016. Bell, D., and M. Parker, eds. 2009. Space travel & culture: From apollo to space tourism. New York: Wiley-Blackwell. Bryld, M., and N. Lykke. 2000. Cosmodolphins: Feminist cultural studies of technology, animals, and the sacred. London: Zed Books. Dick, S. J., and R. D. Launius, eds. 2007. Societal impact of spaceflight. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration Office of External Relations History Divisions. Dickens, P., and J. Ormrod, eds. 2016. The palgrave handbook of society, culture, and outer space. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Horner, J., A. Gorman, A. Cairns, and W. Short. 2015. “The gender balance of the Australian space research community: A snapshot from the 15th ASRC, 2015.” 15th Australian Space Research Conference, University New South Wales, Canberra, 29 September - 1 October 2015. Jennings, R. T., and E. S. Baker. 2000. Gynecological and reproductive issues for women in space: A review. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey 55 (2):109–16. doi:10.1097/00006254-200002000-00025. Kilgore, D., and W. Douglas. 2003. Astrofuturism: Science, race, and visions of utopia in space. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Lathers, M. 2012. Space oddities: Women and outer space in popular film and culture, 1960–2000. New York: Continuum. Llinares, D. 2011. The astronaut: Cultural mythology and idealised masculinity. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Messeri, L. 2017. Gestures of cosmic relation and the search for another Earth. Environmental Humanities 9 (2):325–40. doi:10.1215/22011919-4215325. McQuaid, K. 2007. Racism, sexism and space ventures. In Societal impact of spaceflight, ed. S. Dick and R. Launius, 421–50. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Penley, C. 1997. NASA/TREK: Popular science and sex in America. London and New York: Verso. Pesterfield, C. 2016. Cosmofeminism: Challenging patriarchy in outer space. In The palgrave handbook of society, culture, and outer space, ed. P. Dickens and J. Ormrod, 167–90. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Sage, D. 2009. Giant leaps and forgotten steps: NASA and the performance of gender. The Sociological Review 57 (1):146–63. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2009.01822.x. Shetterly, M. L. 2016. Hidden figures: The story of African-American women who helped win the space race. New York: Morrow. Valentine, D. 2012. Exit strategy: Profit, cosmology, and the future of humans in space. Anthropological Quarterly 85 (4):1045–67. doi:10.1353/anq.2012.0073. Weitekamp, M. A. 2004. Right stuff, wrong sex: America’s first women in the space program. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.