Response to systemic therapy in locally advanced and metastatic renal cell carcinoma: can it be predicted?

ABSTRACT

Introduction

: Renal cell carcinoma is no longer considered a monolithic disease, but a group of different entities exhibiting unique molecular alterations requiring a tailored systemic approach. One of the remaining challenges is the identification of the best candidate for a particular therapeutic regimen.

Areas covered

: Current literature regarding the recent advances and treatment options in systemic therapy for metastatic RCC, and issues pertaining to the available biomarkers tested to date for a correct treatment stratification.

Expert opinion

: Underlying biology of RCC will still drive the development of new treatment agents/combinations that will be tested in earlier stages of the disease, and probably prove to have a role in the neoadjuvant/adjuvant settings. The correct characterization of the tumor microenvironment through transcriptomic analysis should help to overcome the issues related to tumor heterogeneity. Preclinical ex-vivo models will enlarge our current knowledge regarding the potential immune-escape mechanisms exhibited by RCC, and facilitate a better monitoring of the response to therapy. New tracers, image modalities, and tests aimed at detecting and analyzing tumor-circulating cells will improve our clinical performance through a better identification of the metastatic site locations and their variable histologic patterns, and ultimately their behavior in response to treatment.

KEYWORDS:

• Renal cell carcinoma
• cytokine
• tyrosine kinase inhibitor
• immune checkpoint inhibitor
• systemic therapy
• biomarker
• response

Declaration of interest

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

Reviewer disclosures

Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.

Additional information

Funding

This paper received no funding.