Second trimester marginal cord insertion is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the feasibility in visualizing placental cord insertion (PCI) during second-trimester fetal anatomical survey and the association between marginal cord insertion (MCI) and preterm delivery (PTD) and low birth weight (LBW). Our secondary objectives were to evaluate the association of MCI with adverse composite obstetrical and neonatal outcomes.

Methods: A prospective cohort study was performed over a 28-month period. Women with singleton pregnancies presenting for routine anatomical survey between 18 and 22 weeks’ gestation were included. PCI site was visualized on 2D grayscale and color Doppler and the shortest distance from the sagittal and transverse planes to the placental edge were recorded. MCI was diagnosed when any of measured distances was ≤2 cm. Correlations were assessed via bivariate chi-squared, independent t-test analyses and Fisher’s exact tests. Regression models evaluated associations between MCI and adverse composite outcomes.

Results: Three hundred one women were included and PCI was feasible in all cases. The incidence of MCI was 11.3% (n = 34). Baseline characteristics between those with and without MCI were similar, except for story of prior PTD, which was greater among those with MCI (17.65 versus 7.17%, p = .04). MCI was associated with increased likelihood of LBW (RR four; 95%CI, 1.46–10.99) and PTD (RR 3.2; 95%CI, 1.53–6.68); in multivariate analysis, we found associations between MCI and composite adverse obstetrical (RR 2.33; 95%CI, 1.30–4.19) and neonatal (RR 2.46; 95%CI, 1.26–4.81) outcomes.

Conclusions: Evaluation of PCI is feasible in all cases. Second-trimester MCI is associated with increased likelihood for LBW, PTD, and composite adverse obstetrical and neonatal outcomes.

Keywords:

• Cord insertion
• placenta
• marginal
• preterm delivery
• ultrasound

Acknowledgements

We thank Malini D. Persad, MD; MPH and Karyn Wat, MD and Sandhya Matha, MD for their contributions in this study.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflict of interest.