268
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

A comparison of pregnancy outcomes after second-trimester amniocentesis between cases with penetration of the placenta and nonpenetration

, , , , , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 3883-3888 | Received 14 Sep 2019, Accepted 04 Dec 2019, Published online: 16 Apr 2020
 

Abstract

Objective

To compare the fetal loss rate associated with second-trimester amniocentesis between the procedures with penetration and nonpenetration of the placenta, as a primary outcome and to compare the rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes including preterm birth, fetal growth restriction and low birth weight, as secondary outcomes.

Method

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on women undergoing second-trimester amniocentesis. Our prospective database of amniocentesis, from January 1989 to December 2018, was accessed to retrieve the records meeting the inclusion criteria consisting of singleton pregnancies, gestational age of 16–22 weeks, and known obstetric outcomes. The patients were categorized into two groups: placental penetration and nonpenetration. The rates of fetal loss, including abortion (<24 weeks of gestation) and fetal death in utero (>24 weeks of gestation), and other adverse pregnancy outcomes were compared between the two groups.

Results

A total of 21,566 procedures were performed during the study period. Of them, 8601 were excluded due to chromosomal/structural abnormalities, various underlying medical diseases and incomplete data or unavailability of final outcomes. Finally, 12,965 cases were available for analysis including 4692 (36.2%) in the group of placental penetration and 8273 (63.8%) in the group of nonpenetration. The abortion rate after amniocentesis trended to be increased in the placental penetration group (0.6 versus 0.4%, p = .064; RR: 1.60, 95%CI 0.97-2.64). Likewise, the fetal loss rate trended to be increased in the placental penetration group (1.0 versus 0.7%, p = .121; RR: 1.35 95%CI 0.92–1.98). Interestingly, preterm birth rate was significantly increased in the placental penetration group (13.8 versus 12.6%, p = .043; RR: 1.10 95%CI 1.00–1.20).

Conclusion

Fetal loss rate was slightly increased, but not statistically significant, among the procedures with placental penetration. However, penetration of the placenta was slightly but significantly associated with an increase in rates of preterm birth.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Author contributions

PC: conceptualization, acquisition of data, data validation, manuscript writing. CW: database development, acquisition of data, final approval. WP: database development, acquisition of data, final approval. SS: database development, acquisition of data, final approval. FT: acquisition of data, final approval. KS: acquisition of data, final approval. SL: acquisition of data, final approval. KT: acquisition of data, final approval. PJ: acquisition of data, final approval. TT: conceptualization, database development, data validation and analysis manuscript editing

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by The Chiang Mai University Research Fund [CMU-2562], and The Thailand Research Fund [DPG-6280003].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.