The Indo-Pacific and Space Diplomacy: Opportunities and Challenges

ABSTRACT

The Indo-Pacific is a dynamic and competitive geopolitical region. Besides its core maritime nature, there is also outer space politics. There are three important spacefaring states in the region, namely India, Japan, and China, as well as dozens of emerging space countries. Entering the New Space era, however, tense space competition among them is increasing. While space technologies are becoming a significant part of the pursue of their cooperative developmental agenda, so is the use of it for their own national security interests. The problem that arises is whether space diplomacy increases or decreases the stability of the competitive Indo-Pacific region. This paper aims to explore the opportunities and challenges of how space diplomacy can be a means to keep a stable Indo-Pacific by using qualitative approaches and concepts of space diplomacy.

Acknowledgments

The authors thanked the Government of Indonesia’s Ministry of Research and Technolog-BRIN and the Indonesia Endowment Fund for Education (LPDP), Ministry of Finance, Republic of Indonesia.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

¹ I. Gusti Bagus Dharma Agastia and Anak Agung Banyu Perwita, “Indonesia’s Maritime Axis and the Security of Sea Lanes of Communications (SLOCs) in the Indo-Pacific,” Jurnal Hubungan Internasional 5, no. 1 (2016): 10–21, https://doi.org/10.18196/hi.2016.0081.10-21.

² Vijay Sakhuja and Kapil Narula, Maritime Dynamics in the Indo-Pacific (Delhi: Vij Books India Pvt Ltd, 2016).

³ Rajeswari Pillai Rajagopalan, “A New Space Race in Asia,” East Asia Forum (blog), May 18, 2018, https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2018/05/18/a-new-space-race-in-asia/.

⁴ “Space Middle Powers are uniquely reliant on space-based services outside their direct national control; this reliance combined with the fragility of and lack of stability in the space domain lead to a series of key vulnerabilities that need to be addressed and managed.” Daniel Golston and Ben Baseley-Walker, “The Realities of Middle Power Space Reliance” (UNIDIR, December 6, 2015), https://www.unidir.org/publication/realities-middle-power-space-reliance.

⁵ Dewi Fortuna Anwar, “Indonesia and the ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific,” International Affairs 96, no. 1 (January 1, 2020): 111–29, https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiz223.

⁶ Yunita Permatasari, “State and Business Groups in the Space Industry,” Andalas Journal of International Studies (AJIS) 7, no. 2 (November 30, 2018): 74–88, https://doi.org/10.25077/ajis.7.2.74-88.2018.

⁷ Geoffrey Forden, “China and Space War,” Astropolitics 6, no. 2 (2008): 138–53.

⁸ Mian Zahid Hussain and Raja Qaiser Ahmed, “Space Programs of India and Pakistan: Military and Strategic Installations in Outer Space and Precarious Regional Strategic Stability,” Space Policy 47 (2019): 63–75.

⁹ Kingston Reif and Shannon Bugos, “Russia Tests ASAT Weapon, US Says,” Arms Control Today 50, no. 7 (2020): 36–37.

¹⁰ Barry G. Buzan and Ole Waever, Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security (New York, USA: Cambridge University Press, 2003).

¹¹ Barry Buzan, “The Geopolitical Reconstruction of Asia: A Reflection Ten Years on from Regions and Powers,” Politique Etrangere Summer Issue, no. 2 (July 19, 2012): 331–344.

¹² Robert O. Keohane and Joseph S. Nye Jr, Power & Interdependence, 4th Edition (Boston: Pearson, 2011).

¹³ Geoff R. Berridge, Diplomacy: Theory and Practice (Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015).

¹⁴ Andrew F. Cooper, Jorge Heine, and Ramesh Thakur, The Oxford Handbook of Modern Diplomacy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).

¹⁵ Stephen N. Whiting, “Space and Diplomacy: A New Tool for Leverage,” Astropolitics 1, no. 1 (January 1, 2003): 54–77, https://doi.org/10.1080/1477-760391832516.

¹⁶ See https://www.unoosa.org/.

¹⁷ United Nations General Assembly, “The ‘Space2030’ Agenda: Space as a Driver of Sustainable Development,” Resolution (United Nations, October 28, 2021), https://www.unoosa.org/res/oosadoc/data/resolutions/2021/general_assembly_76th_session/ares763_html/A_RES_76_3_E.pdf.

¹⁸ Eligar Sadeh, ed., Space Strategy in the 21st Century: Theory and Policy, 1st edition (London: Routledge, 2013).

¹⁹ Roger Handberg, “Rationales of the Space Program,” in Space Politics and Policy: An Evolutionary Perspective, ed. Eligar Sadeh (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002), 33.

²⁰ Ian A. Christensen and Christopher D. Johnson, “Putting the White House Executive Order on Space Resources in an International Context,” The Space Review (blog), April 27, 2020, https://www.thespacereview.com/article/3932/1.

²¹ China SCIO, “Full Text: China’s Space Activities in 2016,” Government, The State Council Information Office of the People’s Republic of China, December 27, 2016, http://www.scio.gov.cn/zfbps/ndhf/34120/Document/1537022/1537022.htm.

²² Namrata Goswami, “China in Space: Ambitions and Possible Conflict,” Strategic Studies Quarterly 12, no. 1 (2018): 74–97.

²³ Christian Beckner, “US-Japan Space Policy: A Framework for 21st Century Cooperation” (Center for Strategic and International Studies, 2003), https://www.csis.org/analysis/us-japan-space-policy-framework-21st-century-cooperation.

²⁴ JAXA, “JAXA | NASA-JAXA Joint Statement on Space Exploration,” Government, JAXA | Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, January 26, 2018, https://global.jaxa.jp/press/2018/01/20180126_nasa.html.

²⁵ JAXA, “JAXA | JAXA-ESA Joint Statement Concerning the Bilateral Cooperation,” Government, JAXA | Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, March 3, 2018, https://global.jaxa.jp/press/2018/03/20180303_esa.html.

²⁶ DLR, “DLR – German-Japanese Cooperation in Aerospace,” Government, DLRARTICLE DLR Portal, April 13, 2022, https://www.dlr.de/content/en/articles/news/2022/02/20220413_german-japanese-cooperation-in-aerospace.html.

²⁷ ASI, “ASI and JAXA sign the Memorandum of Cooperation,” Government, ASI (blog), October 15, 2020, https://www.asi.it/en/2020/10/asi-and-jaxa-sign-the-memorandum-of-cooperation/.

²⁸ JAXA, “JAXA | International Cooperation,” Government, JAXA | Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, https://global.jaxa.jp/activity/int/ (accessed February 7, 2022).

²⁹ Kim Hwan Doo, Global Issues Surrounding Outer Space Law and Policy (Hershey: IGI Global, 2021), 184.

³⁰ JAXA, “JAXA | International Cooperation.”

³¹ Science Department of Industry, “Australia and Japan strengthen space collaborations,” Text, Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources (Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources, July 13, 2020), https://www.industry.gov.au/news/australia-and-japan-strengthen-space-collaborations.

³² ISRO, “ISRO Telemetry, Tracking and Command Network (ISTRAC),” Government, Indian Space Research Organization, Department of Space, Government of India, https://www.isro.gov.in/about-isro/isro-telemetry-tracking-and-command-network-istrac (accessed May 18, 2022).

³³ Ministry of External Affairs, “Joint Statement between the India and China during Prime Minister’s Visit to China,” Government, Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India, May 15, 2015, https://www.mea.gov.in/bilateral-documents.htm?dtl/25240/Joint_Statement_between_the_India_and_China_during_Prime_Ministers_visit_toChina.

³⁴ Sutirtho Patranobis, “India Engaged with China for Lunar Mission, Talks Failed to Take Off,” Hindustan Times, March 11, 2019, https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/india-china-space-mission-fails-to-take-off/story-fJssc1E22JxJEUPVIJZ81O.html.

³⁵ Nicholas Andrew Assef, “China’s Control of the Heavens: An Overview of the Rapidly Developing Space Silk Road,” SSRN Scholarly Paper (Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, May 9, 2018), https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3176348; and Zi Qiang Lin, “Belt and Road Initiative: The New Silk Road for the New Chinese Era Analysis of the Initiative and Its Delicate Role in a Global Pandemic.” (Venice, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, 2021), http://dspace.unive.it/handle/10579/19335.

³⁶ Haifeng Zhao, “Current Legal Status and Recent Developments of APSCO and Its Relevance to Pacific Rim Space Law and Activities,” Journal of Space Law 35 (2009): 559.

³⁷ Mingyan Nie, “Asian Space Cooperation and Asia-Pacific Space Cooperation Organization: An Appraisal of Critical Legal Challenges in the Belt and Road Space Initiative Context,” Space Policy 47 (February 1, 2019): 224–31, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spacepol.2019.01.008.

³⁸ Manasi Singh, “SAARC for Geopolitical Symbolism: Whither Multilateralism?” South Asian Survey 23, no. 1 (March 1, 2016): 1–16, https://doi.org/10.1177/0971523118760628.

³⁹ Ms Afeera Firdous, “Space Cooperation as a Diplomatic Tool: Prospects for Pakistan,” CISS Insight Journal 7, no. 1 (2019): 65–84.

⁴⁰ David LX Hoa and Eren Gorurb, “Space Amongst the Giants: A New Course for Asia-Pacific Space Cooperation” (68th International Astronautical Congress (IAC), Adelaide, Australia: International Astronautical Federation, 2017).

⁴¹ Francis Grimal and Jae Sundaram, “The Incremental Militarization of Outer Space: A Threshold Analysis,” Chinese Journal of International Law 17, no. 1 (March 1, 2018): 45–72, https://doi.org/10.1093/chinesejil/jmy006.

⁴² Fabio Tronchetti, “Preventing the Weaponization of Outer Space: Is a Chinese–Russian–European Common Approach Possible?” Space Policy 27, no. 2 (May 1, 2011): 81–88, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spacepol.2011.02.001.

⁴³ Paul Meyer, “Dark Forces Awaken: The Prospects for Cooperative Space Security,” The Nonproliferation Review 23, no. 3–4 (July 3, 2016): 495–503, https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700.2016.1268750.

⁴⁴ Bleddyn Bowen, “Space Oddities: Law, War and the Proliferation of Spacepower,” in Routledge Handbook of War, Law and Technology, ed. James Gow, Ernst Dijxhoorn, Rachel Kerr and Guglielmo Verdirame (London: Routledge, 2019), 269.

⁴⁵ Deden Habibi Ali Alfathimy, Totok Sudjatmiko, and Euis Susilawati, “Ketimpangan Pemanfaatan Orbit Geostasioner (GSO) Dalam Lingkungan Sistem Dunia,” Intermestic: Journal of International Studies 4, no. 1 (November 29, 2019): 88, https://doi.org/10.24198/intermestic.v4n1.6.

⁴⁶ Venkatesan Sundararajan, “Economic and Performance Analysis of Indian Space Transportation Systems,” (AIAA SPACE 2010 Conference & Exposition, Anaheim, California: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2010), https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2010-8708.

⁴⁷ Hussain and Ahmed, “Space Programs of India and Pakistan.”

⁴⁸ Joan Johnson-Freese and David Burbach, “The Outer Space Treaty and the Weaponization of Space,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 75, no. 4 (July 4, 2019): 137–141, https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2019.1628458.

⁴⁹ Evelyn Goh, “The Asia Pacific’s” Age of Uncertainty”: Great Power Competition, Globalisation, and the Economic-Security Nexus,” Working Paper, RSIS Working Paper (Singapore: S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, June 10, 2020).

⁵⁰ Evelyn Goh and Jochen Prantl, “Why Strategic Diplomacy Matters for Southeast Asia,” East Asia Forum Quarterly 9 (2017): 36–39.

⁵¹ David Huang, “Building Security and Integration in the Asia Pacific,” East Asia Forum, June 13, 2015, https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2015/06/13/building-security-and-integration-in-the-asia-pacific/.

⁵² Frank A. Rose, “The Role of Diplomacy in Keeping Outer Space Safe, Secure, and Sustainable,” U.S. Department of State, April 14, 2016, https://2009-2017.state.gov/t/avc/rls/255834.htm.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the RISPRO-PRN-LPDP National Research Grant from the Ministry of Research & Technology-National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN) and the Indonesia Endowment Fund for Education (LPDP), Ministry of Finance, Republic of Indonesia, at 2020-2024 (Keputusan Direktur Utama Lembaga Pengelola Dana Pendidikan Nomor KEP-36/LPDP/2020) .