CABG in patients with liver cirrhosis: to pump or not to pump?

ABSTRACT

Introduction

Coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with established liver cirrhosis is generally associated with poor outcomes. Avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in these patients has not demonstrated any advantage over the use of CPB. We review the current available literature that compared the outcome of both on-pump (ONCABG) and off-pump (OPCAB) techniques in cirrhotic patients in terms of morbidity and mortality.

Areas covered

A comprehensive search was conducted in the PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases in January 2021. Articles that reported outcomes of OPCAB and/or ONCABG in cirrhotic patients with no concomitant surgical procedures were included. 829 unique abstracts were retrieved with title and abstract screening completed independently by two reviewers. Two case studies and six retrospective cohort studies were included. The largest study comprised more than 98% of the total population, showing some survival benefit for OPCAB over ONCABG. However, it was population-based and did not report the severity of liver. The remaining studies reported no clear difference in outcome between the two techniques.

Expert opinion

Surgical myocardial revascularisation carries high perioperative risk in patients with liver cirrhosis irrespective of the surgical technique. There is a lack of evidence to suggest that avoiding CPB in these patients may be beneficial.

KEYWORDS:

• Coronary artery bypass grafting
• cardiopulmonary bypass
• liver cirrhosis

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Siu Yu, the information specialist at Queen’s University, Bracken Health Sciences Library, for refining our search strategy.

Declaration of Interest

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

Reviewer disclosures

Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.

Additional information

Funding

This paper was not funded.