390
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Examining Sleep Duration and Sleep Health Among Sexual Minority and Heterosexual Adults: Findings From NHANES (2005-2014)

ORCID Icon &
Pages 345-357 | Published online: 27 Mar 2019
 

ABSTRACT

Objectives: This study proposed to examine sexual identity differences in sleep duration and sleep health (use of sleep medications or sedatives, trouble sleeping, and diagnosis of sleeping disorders) among American adults. Methods: Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2005–2014) were used. Sex-stratified multiple logistic regression models were used to compare sleep duration and sleep health between sexual minority (gay/lesbian, bisexual, not-sure) and heterosexual participants, adjusted for predetermined covariates. Heterosexual participants were the reference group. Results: The analytic sample included 16,332 participants. No differences in sleep duration or sleep health were detected when gay and bisexual men were compared to heterosexual men. Not-sure men had significantly higher rates of adequate sleep duration than heterosexual men (aOR 2.35 [1.16–4.79]. Compared to heterosexual women, bisexual women reported higher rates of short sleep duration (aOR 1.29 [95% CI = 1.01–1.65]). Bisexual women were also more likely than heterosexual women to use sleep medication or sedatives (aOR 1.85 [95% CI = 1.19–2.88]), to have ever told a health professional they had trouble sleeping (aOR 1.64 [95% CI = 1.15–2.34), and to have been told by a health professional they had a sleeping disorder (aOR 2.38 [95% CI = 1.50–3.80). Lesbian and not-sure women exhibited no differences in sleep duration or sleep health compared to heterosexual women. Conclusions: Findings suggest there is a need to promote sleep health and further investigate sleeping disorders among bisexual women. Additional research should incorporate objective measures of sleep health and examine whether sleep health is associated with chronic disease in sexual minorities.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material for this article can be accessed here.

Additional information

Funding

Dr. Caceres' work on this manuscript was supported by a training grant on Comparative and Cost Effectiveness Research from the National Institute of Nursing Research [T32NR014205].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 316.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.