289
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Investigation of three system shut-down strategies alongside optimization suggestion for proton exchange membrane fuel cells via in-situ measurements

, , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 157-170 | Received 15 Oct 2019, Accepted 03 Jan 2020, Published online: 08 Jan 2020
 

ABSTRACT

Carbon corrosion caused by H2/O2 interface during the shut-down process is one of the factors that exacerbate the overall degradation of proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFC) in automotive applications. Numerous studies have shown that system strategies are beneficial for reducing the duration of H2/O2 interface and alleviating performance degradation. In this paper, three different shut-down strategies are investigated and compared based on the internal behaviors acquired by in-situ measurements. For the three shut-down strategies, reverse current and high potential are mainly observed in a lower constant current and constant power strategy. Comparatively speaking, the internal uniformity of the cell under constant current and power load is better than that with constant voltage strategy when the shut-down time is about the same. The results suggest that adopting a higher constant power load followed by a larger voltage load during the shut-down process can effectively shorten the shut-down time and relieve carbon corrosion. These results add significant new insights into the shut-down process and will be of practical importance in directing design of combined shut-down strategy that can withstand carbon corrosion.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFB0102701), Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Energy Materials for Electric Power (2018B030322001), Guangdong Innovative and Entrepreneurial Research Team Program (2016ZT06N500), Development and Reform Commission of Shenzhen Municipality (2017 No.1106), Shenzhen Peacock Plan (KQTD2016022620054656), and Shenzhen Key Laboratory project (ZDSYS201603311013489) for providing financial support for this research undertaking.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China under Grant [2017YFB0102701]; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Energy Materials for Electric Power under Grant [2018B030322001]; Guangdong Innovative and Entrepreneurial Research Team Program under Grant [2016ZT06N500]; Development and Reform Commission of Shenzhen Municipality under Grant [2017 No.1106]; Shenzhen Peacock Plan under Grant [KQTD2016022620054656] and Shenzhen Key Laboratory project under Grant [ZDSYS201603311013489].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 405.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.