1,965
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Clinical Research

Clinical experience with titrating doses of digoxin antibodies in acute digoxin poisoning. (ATOM-6)

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 433-439 | Received 25 Jun 2021, Accepted 09 Aug 2021, Published online: 23 Aug 2021
 

Abstract

Introduction

For acute digoxin poisoning, it has been recommended to give bolus doses of 10–20 vials or potentially larger than needed doses calculated from dose ingested or the measured concentration. However, a recent revision of internal Poisons Information Centre guidelines prompted a change of our recommendations, specifically instead of large boluses, to use titrating repeated low doses of digoxin antibodies(Digoxin-Fab) based on bedside assessment of cardiac toxicity.

Methods

This is a prospective observational study of patients with acute digoxin poisoning identified through two Poisons Information Centres and three toxicology units. Patient demographics, signs and symptoms of digoxin toxicity, doses and response to Digoxin-Fab, free and bound serum digoxin concentrations. Outcomes were recorded and analysed.

Results

From September 2013 to September 2020, 23 patients with 25 presentations (median age 56 years, females 56%) were recruited. Median dose ingested was 13 mg(IQR: 9.5–25). Median heart rate (HR) was 41 beats/min before treatment. Initial median digoxin and potassium concentrations were 14.5 nmol/L (IQR: 10.9–20) [11.2 µg/L(IQR: 8.4–15.4)] and 5 mmol/L (IQR: 4.5–5.4 mmol/L), respectively. Gastrointestinal symptoms and acute kidney injury were present in 22 patients (88%) and 5 patients (20%), respectively. Four patients received an initial bolus dose of Digoxin-Fab of 5–20 vials. Twenty-one patients received repeated titrated doses (1–2 vials) of Digoxin-Fab and the median total dose was 4 vials (IQR: 2–7.5). Median maximal change in HR post-Digoxin-Fab was 19 beats/min. The median potassium concentration decrease post-Digoxin-Fab was 0.3 mmol/L. Total dose used in the titration group was 25% and 35% of the predicted doses based on the amount of digoxin ingested or measured serum concentration, respectively. Twelve had free digoxin concentrations measured. Free digoxin concentrations dropped to almost zero after any dose of Digoxin-Fab. Ten patients had a rebound of digoxin >2.6 nmol/L (2 µg/L). There were no deaths from acute digoxin toxicity.

Conclusions

The new practice of using small, titrated doses of Digoxin-Fab led to a considerable reduction in total usage and major savings. The clinical response to titrated doses was safe and acceptable in acute digoxin poisoning.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the staff of the New South Wales Poisons Information Centre and Queensland Poisons Information Centre for identifying potential patients with digoxin poisonings that are treated with Digoxin-Fab and the Staff at the Hunter Area Pathology Service (Calvary Mater Newcastle) for performing the free and bound digoxin assays.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

Geoff Isbister – The study was supported by an NHMRC Program [Grant 1055176]. Geoff Isbister is funded by an NHMRC Senior Research Fellowship ID1061041.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 1,501.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.