Abstract
Introduction
Fab antivenom (FabAV) halts progression of tissue injury and improves recovery in copperhead snakebite. It is unknown if F(ab’)2AV does as well. The objective of this study was to compare control of tissue injury in copperhead snakebite patients treated with F(ab’)2AV versus FabAV.
Methods
We performed a post hoc analysis of copperhead envenomated patients in a clinical trial comparing F(ab’)2AV to FabAV. The outcomes for this analysis are the number of repeat doses required to obtain initial control, the number of patients requiring unscheduled doses during maintenance, and the time from antivenom administration to initial control.
Results
Twenty-one (13 F(ab’)2AV, 8 FabAV) were copperhead patients. Median age was 46 years with a male predominance. Baseline severity was similar. One (8%) F(ab’)2AV and 2(25%) FabAV patients required repeat initial dosing, difference = 17%, (95%CI −18, 57%). One (8%) F(ab’)2AV and 1(13%) FabAV patients required additional doses after maintenance, difference = 5%, (95%CI −27, 45%). Median time to initial control was 2.7 range (2.0, 9.3) hours and 3.5 range (2.0, 7.4) for F(ab’)2AV and FabAV respectively, difference −0.8 h (95% CI −2.6, 0.9).
Conclusions
This exploratory analysis suggests that the available measures of the control of venom-induced tissue injury are similar between antivenom subgroups.
Disclosure statement
No funding for this project was received. DEK and MRO report no conflicts of interest.
Correction Statement
This article was originally published with errors, which have now been corrected in the online version. Please see Correction (http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15563650.2023.2242205)