217
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Machine learning approach for categorical biomass higher heating value prediction based on proximate analysis

ORCID Icon &
Pages 3381-3394 | Received 13 Dec 2021, Accepted 04 Apr 2022, Published online: 17 Apr 2022
 

ABSTRACT

The present study attempts a new approach for optimizing higher heating value (HHV) of agricultural biomass from only proximate analysis data, thereby requiring nominal specificity compared to elemental composition-based models. This objective was achieved by classifying the largest extracted 1140 data into five categories and by adopting five machine learning (ML) models namely: Multi Layer Perceptron, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, Linear Regression and Artificial Neural Network. Further, relative correlation and contribution of different input parameters on target variable was performed to forecast the impact level and interaction. It showed higher relevancy factor for FC and VM as 0.82 and 0.91 respectively. Compared to other models, Artificial neural network and Random Forest model provided better accuracy with higher correlation coefficient values (0.991 and 0.989 respectively) and lower root mean square error 0.215 and 0.283 respectively. The validity and applicability of the database and ML modeling were verified using Box plots, in which more than 96% of the data for each category of biomass were located in the valid region. The values of statistical indicators proved better prediction accuracy of our proposed models in comparison to other reported literature models for all predefined categories of biomass.

Abbreviations/Nomenclatures

Abbreviation=

Full form

HHV=

Higher Heating Value (MJ/kg)

FC=

Fixed carbon (wt%)

VM=

Volatile matter (wt%)

ASH=

Ash content (wt%)

ML=

Machine Learning

ANN=

Artificial Neural Network

RF=

Random Forest

MLP=

Multi Layer Perceptron

SVM=

Support Vector Machine

LR=

Linear Regression

WEKA=

Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis

AW=

Agri waste

FBP=

Fruits by product

GL=

Grass leaves and tree species

OWM=

Other waste materials

WC=

Wood chips

wt%=

Mass fraction or percentage by weight

PCC=

Pearson Correlation Coefficient

CC or R2=

Coefficient of correlation

RMSE=

Root mean square error

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability

The datasets of 1140 data generated in this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Additional information

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.