98
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Analyzing the microbial factors affecting microbial enhanced oil recovery through numerical simulation study

& ORCID Icon
Pages 4693-4705 | Received 05 Nov 2021, Accepted 14 May 2022, Published online: 29 May 2022
 

ABSTRACT

Primary and secondary recovery methods are usually not sufficient to maximize the oil recovery. In many cases, more than 40% of the Oil Initially in Place is left in the reservoir after implementing these recovery methods. To resolve the issue at hand, petroleum engineers have at their disposition a plethora of tertiary recovery methods such as chemical flooding, thermal recovery, and microbial enhanced oil recovery (MEOR). In this study, we propose the use of MEOR: a technique that uses naturally occurring microbes in the reservoir or injected microbes to enhance the oil recovery. The MEOR process is governed by several mechanisms such as viscosity reduction, relative permeability alteration, capillary pressure alteration, and other reaction-induced system changes such as pressurization. This study investigates the impact of these mechanisms on the hydrocarbon production by conducting a numerical simulation using our in-house MEOR numerical simulator. In the base case study, the case with MEOR shows the 20% of oil production improvement than the case without MEOR. We conduct a sensitivity analysis to evaluate the impact of microbial factors affecting MEOR to the system responses and production behavior, where the maximum growth rate of microbes is found to be the most influential factor with the scaled sensitivity coefficient of 1.384 × 105. The findings provide the relative impacts of factors affecting the performance of MEOR, which subsequently suggest the factors to be investigated with emphasis for oil production improvement in the MEOR applications.

Nomenclature

Disclosure statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Funding

The authors appreciate the financial support for this research from National Research University Fund of University of Houston 63868.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.