77
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Energy, exergy and economic (3E) study on waste heat utilization of gas turbine by improved recompression cycle and partial cooling cycle

, , ORCID Icon, , , & show all
Pages 4127-4145 | Received 15 Jun 2022, Accepted 28 Mar 2023, Published online: 17 Apr 2023
 

ABSTRACT

As the bottom cycle of gas turbine waste heat utilization, the S-CO2 cycle can enhance the power output capacity of the system. Based on the energy analysis of the recompression cycle and the partial cooling cycle for gas turbine waste heat utilization, the two cycles are improved from the matching of heat exchange flow of regenerator and heater in this paper. Under the same parameters, compared with the cycle before improvement, increase in heat source utilization rate and net power output of improved cycles is 45.69% and 39.31%, 43.54 MW and 35.43 MW, and the power consumption cost is decreased by 0.6106 $/kWh and 0.6289 $/kWh. However, as part of heat recovery inside the system is replaced by the heat of the heat source, the thermal efficiency is decreased by 10.43% and 8.7%, respectively. Variable parameter study is conducted on the two improved cycles to analyze the cycle characteristics from the perspective of energy, exergy, and economy (3E). The results showed that the improved recompression cycle has a high thermal power conversion capacity, higher system thermal efficiency and exergy efficiency and lower power generation cost, while the improved partial cooling cycle has higher waste heat utilization potential. However, the area of heat exchangers in both cycles tends to increase, which is not conducive to the compactness of the system.

Nomenclature

Acronyms=
S-CO2=

supercritical carbon dioxide

3E=

energy exergy and economic

TR=

temperature regenerative heat exchanger

HTR=

high temperature regenerative heat exchanger

LTR=

low temperature regenerative heat exchanger

CRF=

capital recovery coefficient

LCOE=

Levelized cost of energy

APR=

The heat exchanger area per unit power

Symbols=
P=

pressure (MPa)

T=

tempreature (℃)

s=

entropy (kJ⋅kg−1⋅K−1)

Q=

heat value of syngas (MW)

E=

exergy (kJ)

C=

initial investment of each component

ci=

cost rate of major components

A=

aera of system component

yk=

maintenance coefficient

η=

net cycle efficiency

W=

power output or consumption (MW)

m=

mass flow rate (kg⋅s−1)

h=

enthalpy (kJ⋅kg−1)

Δh=

enthalpy difference (kJ⋅kg−1)

ΔT=

temperature difference (℃)

e=

exergy (kJ⋅kg−1)

Subscript=
1, 2, 3 …=

state points of cycle

Max=

theoretical maximum

T=

turbine

th=

thermal

sys=

system

s=

isentropic

k=

interest rate

C=

compressor

MC=

main compressor

RC=

recompressor

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (52076079), Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province, China (Grant No. E2020502013), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2021MS076, 2021MS079).

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

The work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2021MS076, 2021MS079]; Natural Science Foundation of China [52076079]; Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province, China [E2020502013].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.