147
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

A comparison of substance use patterns among lifetime heroin-injecting individuals by racial groups

, &
Pages 260-268 | Received 31 Oct 2018, Accepted 06 Jun 2019, Published online: 30 Jun 2019
 

Abstract

Background: Studies have identified differential substance use patterns by racial groups. One of the most commonly reported differences is a higher rate of injection drug use (IDU) among Non-Hispanic Whites compared to African Americans, but this is complicated by factors related to IDU (e.g. earlier drug-use initiation) that overlap with being White.

Objective: We explored differential substance use-patterns by racial groups within a sample of injection heroin users.

Methods: Substance-use data were collected from 373 not-in-treatment heroin users who endorsed any lifetime injection use (69.4% male). We examined differences in substance-use patterns (e.g. age of initiation, gateway adherence) by racial groups. Multiple t-tests with Bonferroni correction were conducted to understand which demographic and substance-use characteristics varied by racial groups.

Results: Relative to Non-Hispanic Whites, African Americans (45.8% of sample) were more likely to start using heroin earlier in their life, but also more likely to experience a longer delay between starting and regularly using heroin. We also identified differences in the degree of (injection) heroin-use consequences by racial groups. After correcting for multiple comparisons and controlling for age and gender, we observed differences for six substance-use and demographic characteristics by racial group. White participants were younger, started cocaine use earlier, and experienced more heroin-use consequences across two separate domains.

Conclusions: After controlling for injection use, we observed differential substance-use characteristics by racial groups. The findings could be used to develop targeted prevention and harm-reduction strategies.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Ken Bates for recruiting participants and Debra Kish, Joi Moore, Melissa Williams, Elorie Eggleston, Hayley Harrison, and Lisa Sulkowski for data collection and management.

Disclosure of interest

All authors declare no conflict of interest with respect to the conduct or content of this work.

Additional information

Funding

NIH 2 R01 DA015462 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (to MKG), a grant (Joe Young Sr./Helene Lycaki Funds) from the State of Michigan, and funds from the Detroit Wayne Mental Health Authority supported this research. Funding sources had no role in the design, conduct, or analysis of these data, nor the decision to submit this manuscript. Data for this analysis were obtained under registered NIH clinical trials NCT00218309, NCT00218361, NCT00429767, NCT00608504, NCT00684840, NCT00698737, and NCT01536925.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 416.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.