120
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Underreporting of drug use on a survey of electronic dance music party attendees

ORCID Icon &
Pages 321-327 | Received 21 Apr 2019, Accepted 06 Aug 2019, Published online: 20 Aug 2019
 

Abstract

Objectives: Skip-logic is commonly used on electronic surveys in which programs provide follow-up questions to affirmative responses and skip to the next topic in response to non-affirmative responses. While skip-logic helps produce data without contradictory responses, erroneous non-affirmative reports can lead to loss of accurate information. We examined the extent to which type-in drug use responses contradict unreported use in a survey of a high-risk population—electronic dance music (EDM) party attendees.

Design: We surveyed 1029 EDM party-attending adults (ages 18–40) using time-spacing sampling in 2018. We examined the extent to which reporting of recent drug use via type-in responses occurred after past-year use of the same drugs were unreported earlier on the same survey. Changes in prevalence of use and predictors of providing discordant responses were examined.

Results: 3.6% of participants typed in names of drugs they had used that they did not report using earlier on the survey. Changes in prevalence were not significant when correcting contradictory responses, but prevalence of past-year cocaine use increased from 23.3% to 24.3%. Those with a college degree were at lower odds for providing a discordant response (aOR = 0.13, p = .019). Females (aOR = 2.82, p = .022), those earning ≥$1000 per week (aOR = 11.03, p = .011), and those identifying as gay/lesbian (aOR = 5.20, p = .032) or bisexual or other sexuality (aOR = 15.12, p < .001) were at higher odds of providing a discordant response.

Conclusions: Electronic surveys that query drug use can benefit from follow-up (e.g. open-ended) questions not dependent on previous responses, as they may elicit affirmative responses underreported earlier in the survey.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by National Institute on Drug Abuse. Research reported in this press release was supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health under Award Numbers K01DA038800 and R01DA044207. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 416.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.