Abstract
Background
Childhood maltreatment (CM) can be an impediment to normative development and consistently predicts increased risk for substance misuse and polysubstance use (polySU). Yet, a subset of individuals who experience CM exhibit successful adaptations across the lifespan. Although there is an expansive literature on socioemotional and cognitive protective factors that mitigate impacts of CM, less is known about other, intra-individual resilience-promoting factors (e.g. positive future orientation) known to assuage high-risk SU patterns during adolescence.
Method
This study examined heterogeneity in individual-level resilience characteristics in maltreated youth as it related to CM characteristics and SU patterns during adolescence. Participants included maltreated youth from the longitudinal LONGSCAN sample (N = 355; 181 females). Latent Profile Analysis was used to identify subgroups of CM-exposed individuals based on five resilience indicator variables (i.e. commitment to goals, engaging in demanding activities, self-reliance, positive future orientation, and externalizing behaviors). Tests for differences in SU patterns and CM characteristics between the resultant profiles were performed.
Results
Data models revealed three latent profiles based on participants’ resilience traits (i.e. Low Resilience, Average Resilience, and High Resilience). There were no profile differences on the basis of CM characteristics. Those in the High Resilience profile were less likely to engage in polySU compared to the Average Resilience profile.
Implications
These findings highlight the promise of individual-level resilience factors that are not necessarily dependent upon caregiver or environmental inputs as protective against polySU following CM. This work represents a promising avenue for future preventative intervention efforts targeting emergent SU behaviors in high-risk youth.
Acknowledgments
Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (Grant no. K01AA026854). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Ethical statement
The research in this paper does not require ethics board approval. Each LONGSCAN site obtained study approval from their respective institutional review boards and informed consent and/or assent from all child and caregiver participants.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Notes
1 Ages 0–16 were examined, rather than up to age 18, to ensure that maltreatment occurring after indicators measured at age 16 were not included. This latter measure was used as a global indicator of CM chronicity.
2 These age ranges were chosen to approximate before and after puberty, as this has been shown to be a potentially critical distinction in the proliferation of CM effects on developmental outcomes (Cowell et al. Citation2015).