322
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Think Piece

Alcohol use disorder conceptualizations and diagnoses reflect their sociopolitical context

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , , , , , , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 307-312 | Received 04 May 2022, Accepted 18 Nov 2022, Published online: 06 Dec 2022
 

Abstract

The present paper highlights how alcohol use disorder (AUD) conceptualizations and resulting diagnostic criteria have evolved over time in correspondence with interconnected sociopolitical influences in the United States. We highlight four illustrative examples of how DSM-defined alcoholism, abuse/dependence, and AUD have been influenced by sociopolitical factors. In doing so, we emphasize the importance of recognizing and understanding such sociopolitical factors in the application of AUD diagnoses. Last, we offer a roadmap to direct the process of future efforts toward the improved diagnosis of AUD, with an emphasis on pursuing falsifiability, acknowledging researchers’ assumptions about human behavior, and collaborating across subfields. Such efforts that center the numerous mechanisms and functions of behavior, rather than signs or symptoms, have the potential to minimize sociopolitical influences in the development of diagnostic criteria and maximize the treatment utility of diagnoses.

Ethical statement

The research in this paper does not require ethics board approval.

Disclosure statement

Dr. Katie Witkiewitz is a member of the Alcohol Clinical Trials Initiative (ACTIVE) Workgroup, which has been supported previously, but not in the past 36 months, by Abbott/Abbvie, Amygdala Neurosciences, Arbor Pharmaceuticals, GSK, Indivior, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, and Schering Plow, but in the past 36 months its activities were supported by Alkermes, Dicerna, Ethypharm, Lundbeck, Mitsubishi, and Otsuka. Dr. Witkiewitz is also on the Scientific Advisory Board for Pear Therapeutics and has consulted with and collaborated on scientific presentations with Alkermes. The other authors have no declarations of interest.

Notes

1 Not all explanations of addiction that center on addiction as a breakdown in self-regulation are moralizing. For example, behavioral economics is consistent with the idea of irrational or disordered choice (e.g. Rachlin et al. Citation1981) but fails to hold the same moralizing undertones that assume disordered choice is a product of sin or moral failing.

Additional information

Funding

CLB is funded through [K08030301] (Principal Investigator: Boness). VRV is funded through [F31AA029266] (Principal Investigator: Votaw). ALW is funded through [K99AA028306] (Principal Investigator: Watts). MWF is funded through NIDA [T32DA015035] (mPI/Director R. Cunningham-Williams and K. Bucholz).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 416.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.