ABSTRACT
Introduction: Transcatheter aortic replacement (TAVR) has revolutionized the treatment of aortic stenosis during the last years. Despite improvements in transcatheter heart valve systems, the rate of conduction disturbances after TAVR, particularly new-onset left bundle branch block (new-onset LBBB), has not decreased over time.
Areas covered: Overview of the current data regarding new-onset LBBB post-TAVR focusing on clinical outcomes.
Expert opinion: New-onset LBBB remains the most common complication after TAVR, occurring in 6–77% of cases with the use of newer generation transcatheter valve systems. The most consistent factor determining new-onset LBBB post-TAVR has been prosthesis implantation depth. The potential evolution to high degree atrioventricular block (HAVB) and the chronic effect on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) may impact the clinical outcomes in this subset of patients. New-onset LBBB has been associated with an increased risk of PPM after TAVR. Conversely, inconsistent results have been reported regarding the impact of LBBB on hospitalization for heart failure and mortality. Current data do not support an indication for ‘prophylactic’ PPM in all new-onset LBBB patients. However, a specific subset of patients (those with either a very long PR or wide QRS) may benefit from a PPM to prevent HAVB or sudden death.
Acknowledgments
The authors want to thank Melanie Coté, MSc, and Hélène Trudel, from the Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Quebec City, Canada, for their help in the preparation of Figures. Dr. Muntané-Carol, Dr. Junquera and Dr del Val were supported by a research grant from the Fundación Alfonso Martín Escudero (Madrid, Spain). Dr. Rodés-Cabau holds the Canadian Research Chair “Fondation Famille Jacques Larivière” for the Development of Structural Heart Disease Interventions.
Declaration of interest
Dr Rodés-Cabau has received institutional research grants from Edwards Lifesciences and Medtronic. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript.
Reviewer Disclosures
Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.