587
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Can the subaltern sing? Analogy, alienation and discursive precarity in Derek Walcott’s Omeros

Pages 460-472 | Published online: 17 Jun 2020
 

ABSTRACT

The contribution of postcolonial writing to our understanding of precarity lies in its post-structuralist emphasis on the question of representation so that the act of representing precarity becomes discursively precarious. Gayatri Spivak’s foundational essay “Can the Subaltern Speak?” provides us with conceptual tools to problematize what may be called “discursive precarity” – that is, that set of enunciative conditions in which intellectuals speak on behalf of the precariat – but also run the risk of silencing them by substituting subaltern voices with their own. The article explores Derek Walcott’s Omeros as a poem of discursive precarity by examining a rhetorically unstable double-movement, wherein the poet-narrator’s identification with, and alienation from, the subaltern is dialectically and irremediably mediated by his own position of privilege. Paradoxically, the poem can only achieve legitimacy through the acknowledgement of its lack of legitimacy to sing of, and for, the subaltern.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

References

  • Aristotle. 1951. Poetics. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.
  • Bhabha, Homi. [1994] 2008. “Introduction: Locations of Culture.” In The Location of Culture, i–xxvii. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Breslin, Paul. 2001. Nobody’s Nation: Reading Derek Walcott. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Burnett, Paula. 2001. Derek Walcott: Politics and Poetics. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Press.
  • Butler, Judith. 2009. “Introduction: Precarious Life, Grievable Life.” In Frames of War: When Is Life Grievable?, 1–32. London and New York: Verso.
  • Carrigan, Anthony. 2011. Postcolonial Tourism: Literature, Culture, and Environment. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Césaire, Aimé. [1939] 2017. Journal of a Homecoming [Cahier D’un Retour Au Pays Natal]. Translated by Gregson Davies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Cohen, Margaret. 2010. The Novel and the Sea. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Escobar, Arturo. 1995. Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Fanon, Frantz. [1961] 2004. “On National Culture.” In The Wretched of the Earth, edited by Richard Philcox, 145–180. New York: Grove Press.
  • Farrell, Joseph. 1997. “Walcott’s Omeros: The Classical Epic in a Postmodern World.” In The Poetics of Derek Walcott: Intertextual Perspectives, edited by Gregson Davis, 247–273. Special issue, The South Atlantic Quarterly 92 (2).  Durham, NC: Duke University Press..
  • Hamner, Robert. 1997. Epic of the Dispossessed: Derek Walcott’s Omeros. Columbia, MO and London: University of Missouri Press.
  • Jakobson, Roman, and Morris Hale. 1956. Fundamentals of Language. The Hague: Mouton.
  • Jameson, Fredric. 1986. “Third-World Literature in the Era of Multinational Capitalism.” Social Text 15: 65–88. doi:10.2307/466493.
  • Melas, Nathalie. 2005. ““Forgettable Vacations and Metaphor in Ruins: Walcott’s Omeros.” In “Derek Walcott Special Issue.” Callaloo 28 (1): 147–168. doi:10.1353/cal.2005.0028.
  • Moss, Roger. 2003. “Derek Walcott’s Omeros: Representing St Lucia, Re-presenting Homer.” In Islands in History and Representation, edited by Rod Edmond and Vanessa Smith, 146–161. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Quintilian. [1920] 1996. Institutio Oratoria. Books I-III. (H. E. Butler, trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Ramazani, Jahan. 1997. “The Wound of History: Walcott’s Omeros and the Postcolonial Poetics of Affliction.” PMLA: Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 112 (3): 405–417. doi:10.2307/462949.
  • Roy, Sneharika. 2018. The Postcolonial Epic: From Melville to Walcott and Ghosh. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Spivak, Gayatri Chakraborty. [1988] 1999. “Can the Subaltern Speak? Speculations on Widow Sacrifice.” In A Critique of Postcolonial Reason: Toward A History of the Vanishing Present, 198–311. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Spivak, Gayatri Chakraborty. [1989] 1990. “Negotiating the Structures of Violence [Interview].” In The Post-Colonial Critic: Interviews, Strategies, Dialogues, edited by Sarah Harasym, 138–151. New York and London: Routledge.
  • Strachan, Ian Gregory. 2002. Paradise and Plantation: Tourism and Culture in the Anglophone Caribbean. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.
  • Sylvester, Christine. 1999. “Development Studies and Postcolonial Studies: Disparate Tales of the ‘Third World’.” Third World Quarterly 20 (4): 703–721. doi:10.1080/01436599913514.
  • Terada, Rei. 1992. Derek Walcott’s Poetry: American Mimicry. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
  • Walcott, Derek. [1990] 1992. Omeros. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
  • Watson, Janell. 2012. “Butler’s Biopolitics: Precarious Community.” Theory & Event 15 (2). Accessed 27 June 2019. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/478357

Notes

1. I follow the traditional Aristotelian definition of analogy premised on proportion (as A is to B, so C is to D; see Aristotle Citation1951, 1457b). In this sense, analogy is a comparison between two relations, and not between two terms, that are explicitly or implicitly compared, as in simile and metaphor. Still, as a form of similitude, analogy is linked to simile and metaphor, though the precise relationship has historically been subject to rhetorical debate (Quintilian Citation[1920] 1996). Metaphor in turn has been famously counterpointed by Jakobson (Citation1956) with metonymy as processes of substitution and contiguity respectively. Walcott’s complex poetics bring all these facets into dense networks of interrelated echoes and ironies.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Sneharika Roy

Sneharika Roy is associate professor of comparative literature at the American University of Paris. Her book The Postcolonial Epic: From Melville to Walcott and Ghosh (2018) offers a fresh comparative theory of epic, bridging classical and postcolonial scholarship. She is also a contributor to the MLA volume on teaching Amitav Ghosh (2019) and to the ongoing encyclopaedic project Dictionnaire encyclopédique des littératures de l’Inde.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 212.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.